I think the grammatical error is in the "next year" part

But then I don't know British English perfectly. Nor do I know "news-speak" well and it often puts words in strange-sounding order. But in this case if they had done news-speak properly they would not have had the "next year" grammatical error.

I do like Red Dwarf a lot though...

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Someone was actually paid to write this first sentence? - musetap 11:33:19 06/27/12 (11)

Maybe - woodyjeff 21:59:54 07/03/12 (0)

Wassamattah, heavy-flow month? - rlw 01:09:27 07/01/12 (1)

Yes, thanks, I feel much better now... - musetap 21:29:52 07/01/12 (0)

If they are both dead how did they record them next year? nt - dancingseamonkey 19:43:30 06/27/12 (0)

well, at least the "Queen are" construction is acceptable in British English - mhardy6647 12:43:39 06/27/12 (4)

I think the grammatical error is in the "next year" part - cfraser 14:05:04 06/27/12 (3)

It's just an awkward construction, not a grammatical error: - J.R. 17:28:48 06/30/12 (0)

You mean they're not recording them next year? - 1973shovel 05:50:23 06/28/12 (1)

Advance Review: Michael's death really matured him as an artist. (nt) - cfraser 14:53:23 06/28/12 (0)

To be titled - LWR 11:39:34 06/27/12 (1)

LOL!!! (nt) - Eric B 13:43:15 06/28/12 (0)

Follow Ups

I think the grammatical error is in the "next year" part - cfraser 14:05:04 06/27/12 (3)

It's just an awkward construction, not a grammatical error: - J.R. 17:28:48 06/30/12 (0)

You mean they're not recording them next year? - 1973shovel 05:50:23 06/28/12 (1)

Advance Review: Michael's death really matured him as an artist. (nt) - cfraser 14:53:23 06/28/12 (0)

I think the grammatical error is in the "next year" part

Post a Message!