Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: Indiana follows CA's "lead" on home solar... posted by dark_dave56 on June 30, 2022 at 03:30:06:
administering, providing transfer infrastructure, and distributing the small irregular increments of solar sources isn't free.
The vast majority of customers do not have the means or opportunity to install solar; why should they subsidize the rates of the (relatively) wealthy?
The trouble with environmental policy is that it's nearly always regressive. The poor get screwed by higher prices they cannot afford, so that the elites can congratulate one another.
Back for a bit again. Ignore me if you like.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: a 1:1 swap costs the utility $; it creates a subsidy paid by all customers through rates - Oldbean2 08:52:26 06/30/22 (5)
- The 1:1 swap of energy (not money) means free electricity... - Ivan303 09:19:06 06/30/22 (3)
- RE: but it isn't free - Oldbean2 09:47:57 06/30/22 (2)
- It all depends on how you want to look at it... - dark_dave56 03:16:43 07/01/22 (0)
- A true 1:1 swap is energy for energy... - Ivan303 12:06:31 06/30/22 (0)
- RE: a 1:1 swap costs the utility $; it creates a subsidy paid by all customers through rates - emailtim 08:59:40 06/30/22 (0)