In Reply to: K15 vs Onken vs K-horns posted by pix on December 15, 2011 at 08:28:35:
> My guess is that the K15 has a more punch (mid bass) and more dynamics, and less low bottom
> Would you agree?Yes, that pretty much describes it. Lower distortion also, allegedly.
I had mine EQ'd flat to 40hz or so in room. EQ is IMHO a good way to go with those K things.
I really enjoyed the Ultraflex too. It was more laid back and forgiving of mediocre recordings. The Karlsons are more akin to horns and sound less like speakers.
Edits: 12/15/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: K15 vs Onken vs K-horns - Greg B 13:02:51 12/15/11 (2)
- RE: K15 vs Onken vs K-horns - poppophall@hotmail.com 11:37:24 01/12/13 (1)
- RE: K15 vs Onken vs K-horns - IG 05:19:41 01/14/13 (0)