In Reply to: My take on it.. give them a break it's their first time at this. posted by Gordon Rankin on November 19, 2003 at 08:11:52:
Yup, it's a rev. 1 thing, but that doesn't go far enough.If a manufacturer didn't send me the information, I would put the company name on a list of like ones in the back as a matter of thoroughness. I bet the manufacturer would meet my deadline the next year. But S'phile has a large stake in not pissing off the manufacturers and dealers. BTW, journalists do this all the time: "Roseanne Barr had no comment...." (Okay, unlikely example.)
Speaking of which, their subscription fulfillment company can't even start a sub on a requested or logical month or mail reliably (even allowing for USPS problems.) That should be trivial enough to result in a very small error rate; I know, I used to work in fulfillment.
Lastly, I think there might have been some errors in the listed speaker prices, possibly having to do with confusion over whether the prices are for pair or not. I'm just working from memory after a casual glance, but I don't think, for example, that KEF's Q models are quite that cheap per pair. It makes me wonder about the other data.
- This signature is two channel only -
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: My take on it.. give them a break it's their first time at this. - suits_me 06:36:33 11/20/03 (0)