Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

UW: I did not note "always positive" style in the couple of...

reviews I read (namely the combo music/3 speaker system review). However, being familar with one of the speakers I did not see that portion of the article as being accurate and/or informative (never cared for nutshell reviews in general.

Think you may be referring to the Gillet Musical Fidelity reviews that rubbed some the wrong way.

I knock the single issue I recently went through as compared to like magazines 20+ years ago.

The old mag's often included test measurements, that while not always useful, were nonetheless there when needed. If nothing else the measurments helped to weed out major flaws/problems one was likely to encounter when system matching.

I also prefer to see equipment reviewed in multiple systems (a practice that seems to be falling out of style). There is a British online mag that used to do this, but they stopped aprrox. 1.5 years ago during/following reconstruction. I realize that doing this is a lot more work for the reviewer (like 6 times as much work to use three systems), but it's still the best way to gather info for an accurate (more accurate) review. This requires time spent that the writers/reviewers need to be compensated for which is probably why such reviews are no longer popular.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • UW: I did not note "always positive" style in the couple of... - DeKay 11:37:06 11/19/03 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.