In Reply to: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable posted by DexysMidnightRunner on March 16, 2014 at 05:39:13:
I can understand why most people who do an actual trial think there is no difference between HDMI cables for video quality.
When I first got my high end Sony backlit LED TV, ISF calibrated and so on, I purchased a series of expensive HDMI cables from Nordost, QED, Chord Company and others, and I really could barely tell a difference between them on video quality.
It was only until I purchased a Mapleshade Vivlink Plus HDMI that I first experienced a video quality improvement, and noticeably. But the Vivlink is a fragile construction bordering on the ridiculous (like all of Mapleshades products), and very susceptible to noise related issues from whatever it touches.
So I have always wondered how the latest Wireworld Platinum Starlight compares. Its good to hear reports of Video improvement from the Ultraviolet, a very affordable cable indeed relative to speciality cables.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable - agisthos 06:22:05 08/20/14 (3)
- RE: REVIEW: Wire World Ultraviolet 7 HDMI Cable - fantja 19:19:50 08/20/14 (2)
- Mapleshade "Plus" HDMI Cable is a well kept secret... - audiophile919 07:57:51 08/25/14 (1)
- RE: Mapleshade "Plus" HDMI Cable is a well kept secret... - fantja 08:27:59 08/25/14 (0)