In Reply to: RE: Schumann frequency - Variation posted by geoffkait on May 2, 2015 at 03:23:32:
Isn't that the rub here? You suggest some brand is best because of accuracy. 7.83xxxxx or whatever.
Well, if the 'target' frequency varies so much than WHY bother with such an accurate oscillator?
It would make more sense to have it adjustible to EACH user and for how each persons frequency varies over time, be that hours, days. or a lifetime.Placement of the device? Sure. Getting that right is worth experiment. And may take a little time.
You are such a condescending schmuck it is amazing. You posit 'questions' to which only you in your benificince have answers than get on the ole high horse when answers are not forthcoming. I'll bet when you worked for NASA that you were in charge of O-Rings.
UPON reflection, I'll contend that repeatability is more important than sheer 'accuracy' to a frequency of unknown value.
If I hit the 'sweet spot' by whatever means in adjusting the frequency, I'd sure like to find it again next time I turned the device ON.
Too much is never enough
Edits: 05/24/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Schumann frequency - Variation - pictureguy 10:04:14 05/02/15 (2)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Variation - geoffkait 10:14:54 05/02/15 (1)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Variation - pictureguy 10:22:49 05/02/15 (0)