In Reply to: RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! posted by pictureguy on April 27, 2015 at 08:49:07:
No, actually, I'm correct. The wavelength of 7.83 Hz is based on the length of the waveguide which in this case is the circumference of the Earth. In addition, when Schumann discovered the wave in the early '50s, guess what, the frequency was 7.83 Hz, same as it is today. Same as it ever was. Hahahaha. Now I'm not saying there can't be small fluctuations, possibly, - after all 7.83 is itself an approximate number - due to say very small variations in the speed of light through the atmosphere but I certainly wouldn't expect to see the number vary by more than a few thousandths. Furthermore, the Acoustic Revive RR-888 is superior to the earlier models because, guess what, it's MORE ACCURATE, more accurate with respect to 7.83 Hz. Hel-loooo!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 09:06:17 04/27/15 (29)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 11:45:31 04/27/15 (28)
- RE: Schumann frequency - unclestu 12:34:09 04/27/15 (18)
- Huh? - geoffkait 12:59:15 04/27/15 (17)
- RE: Huh? - pictureguy 14:06:15 04/27/15 (16)
- Oh, geez - geoffkait 14:30:38 04/27/15 (15)
- RE: Oh, geez - pictureguy 15:59:47 04/27/15 (14)
- RE: Oh, geez - unclestu 20:25:14 04/28/15 (11)
- RE: Oh, geez - used-hifi 10:28:21 08/10/17 (1)
- RE: Oh, geez - geoffkait 09:31:41 08/29/17 (0)
- That's rich - geoffkait 04:16:29 04/29/15 (0)
- RE: Oh, geez - pictureguy 20:36:58 04/28/15 (7)
- RE: Oh, geez - unclestu 21:20:24 04/28/15 (6)
- RE: Oh, geez - pictureguy 00:30:16 04/29/15 (5)
- RE: Oh, geez - unclestu 14:27:40 04/30/15 (4)
- RE: Oh, geez - pictureguy 14:47:37 04/30/15 (3)
- Oh, dear - geoffkait 16:16:42 04/30/15 (2)
- RE: Oh, dear - unclestu 17:19:48 04/30/15 (1)
- Dear Lord - geoffkait 03:55:40 05/01/15 (0)
- RE: Oh, geez - geoffkait 07:15:19 04/28/15 (1)
- RE: Oh, geez - pictureguy 09:57:54 04/28/15 (0)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 12:08:39 04/27/15 (8)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 14:14:15 04/27/15 (7)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 14:46:50 04/27/15 (6)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 18:56:35 04/27/15 (5)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 03:50:09 04/28/15 (4)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 20:39:05 04/28/15 (3)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 02:59:23 04/29/15 (2)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - pictureguy 10:23:51 04/29/15 (1)
- RE: Schumann frequency - Houston, we have a problem! - geoffkait 11:49:06 04/29/15 (0)