Apologies for multiple post on the Audio Circle.Ok, bought the Squeezebox 3, will likely do the Bolder mods and upgrade the PS. I will be using the SB3 with a Tri-Vista DAC (yeah, I have heard all about USB DACS...I am using what I have).
Since I am starting ground up, I have ultimate flexibility on which PC and software to use with the Squeezebox. I will dedicate this PC to music only, nothing else. All of the solutions below will be linked to external USB or FireWire drives. I really want the best combination of ease of use plus sound quality. Feedback?
Apple MAC Mini.
PRO: Complete, compact, reasonably quiet, good value, very user friendly, can use Itunes playing .WAV or AIFF files, easy to burn to external drives.
CON: Accessories add to price, people claim Foobar playing .WAC or FLAC is better, can't use EAC to rip. Can't use my IPAQ as a remote. A bit of a pain to integrate with my current XP computers.Windows XP on a fanless or quiet Mini-Itx System
PRO: I already have an XP system to network to, the opposite of the Apple CON's. Plus, I have a Wifi IPAQ I could use as a remote control, plus I can use Foobar and FLAC or WAV files and EAC.
CON: Have to find and assemble (or have vendor assemble) the necessary hardware. Gordon Rankin claims PC's are inferior to MAC. XP is a huge OS, so I need a hard drive. Probably more than a MAC MINIDamn Small Linux on a fanless Mini-Itx, booting off CF card.
PRO: No hard drive, small and very dedicated, can use FLAC files.
CON: Not user or newbie friendly, still have to figure out how to burn to the external hard drives. Can't use my IPAQI am leaning toward the MAC MINI, primarily due to convenience. Thoughts? Anyone actually do their own A/B comparisons?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - What "sounds" best: PC, MAC Mini, or Linux based transport? - davehg 13:02:18 11/02/05 (28)
- Summary of building a great music server - davehg 13:32:10 11/08/05 (0)
- Look's like it is a MAC Mini based Server, with a SB3 transport - davehg 09:24:46 11/05/05 (2)
- Re: Look's like it is a MAC Mini based Server, with a SB3 transport - routlaw 06:48:31 11/08/05 (0)
- I'm sure I speak for many others on here... - redneckdent 09:59:10 11/05/05 (0)
- AIFF is not Apple Lossless........... - Sordidman 13:56:43 11/04/05 (0)
- No worries - Music Machine 18:19:30 11/02/05 (10)
- Re: No worries - ThomasPf 11:45:16 11/03/05 (9)
- It dosen't have to lock the data rate to the PC - Music Machine 14:29:17 11/03/05 (8)
- Re But doesn't the Squeezebox - Sordidman 13:58:46 11/04/05 (7)
- Yes. (n.t.) - rupertdacat 06:48:13 11/05/05 (0)
- Squeezebox dac - prpixel 14:30:38 11/04/05 (5)
- Reminder.... - Music Machine 15:05:50 11/04/05 (4)
- Re: Reminder.... - gdg 23:27:09 11/06/05 (0)
- Re: Reminder.... - prpixel 16:25:17 11/04/05 (2)
- Re: Reminder.... - prpixel 16:34:14 11/04/05 (1)
- Re: Reminder.... - marc g. 13:46:40 11/07/05 (0)
- Re: What "sounds" best: PC, MAC Mini, or Linux based transport? - John Swenson 15:27:46 11/02/05 (0)
- Depends - audioengr 15:06:12 11/02/05 (1)
- Re: Depends - gdg 23:30:23 11/06/05 (0)
- Z-E-R-O difference sonically. - mac  13:10:59 11/02/05 (8)
- Re: Z-E-R-O difference sonically. - xmasparty@mac.com 13:40:49 11/02/05 (7)
- Great response...one question - davehg 15:01:31 11/02/05 (6)
- Re: Great response...one question - xmasparty@mac.com 17:30:01 11/02/05 (5)
- Re: Great response...one question - bobp 11:01:53 11/03/05 (4)
- Re: Great response...one question - xmasparty@mac.com 11:13:04 11/03/05 (3)
- disk interface - mac   14:45:19 11/03/05 (2)
- Re: disk interface - xmasparty@mac.com 18:24:51 11/03/05 (1)
- Hard drive speed doesn't really matter, hard drive - Sordidman 14:06:14 11/04/05 (0)