Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
I would guess any attack on any drone would be illegal. But I wonder if I could capture it? At least I would find out who owned it after they come banging on my door. (Make 'em PROVE they own it too.)
Shooting at it would certainly be a bad idea. But using a fishing pole and a big hook might snag the thing.
Someone should design and sell a device to shoot a fishing net with a line. so one could capture them and drag them down.A potato gun might work, but then a missed shot might dent a local car... or break a window.
Or a device to over ride the command signal and take over the drone?
This might be well into illegal FCC territory?
Edits: 03/07/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - 3+4=5 08:09:07 03/07/17 (28)
- I think in this case it would be - - Green Lantern 21:44:52 03/11/17 (0)
- Let's see the law go after these guys - Tweaker456 21:11:26 03/11/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - Tre' 11:12:11 03/09/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - The Dill 18:54:34 03/08/17 (1)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - SpotcheckBilly12345 10:35:42 03/09/17 (0)
- I would capture it - bullethead 17:25:32 03/08/17 (0)
- Looney Toons scene: catching one with... - MWE 16:48:17 03/08/17 (0)
- RE: it might seem fitting to down the drone with an..... - user510 10:04:07 03/08/17 (0)
- RE: Only if it's in range of my Remington 870 12 bore(nt) - kitch29 20:35:27 03/07/17 (0)
- The problem changes dramatically if it is a camera drone. - free.ranger 17:49:34 03/07/17 (0)
- Remington has the remedy - Alpha Al 17:33:25 03/07/17 (2)
- The perfect solution !! - AbeCollins 19:22:05 03/07/17 (0)
- Marvelous! [nt] - steve.ott@kctcs.edu 18:30:34 03/07/17 (0)
- no, you do not. - mhardy6647 12:27:19 03/07/17 (0)
- one of the 'rules' of photography probably applies somewhat - stan2 10:40:48 03/07/17 (0)
- Get one of these.... - Rod M 10:07:09 03/07/17 (0)
- The question is... - mkuller 10:00:01 03/07/17 (2)
- excellent article. I hope the States do start writing laws claiming the 500ft limit is personal and private nt - 3+4=5 10:42:02 03/07/17 (0)
- RE: The question is... - srdavis2000 10:23:30 03/07/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - b.l.zeebub 09:39:11 03/07/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - Steve O 09:28:19 03/07/17 (2)
- So far, most stories of drones being shot down or captured, it is illegal - 3+4=5 10:38:23 03/07/17 (1)
- RE: So far, most stories of drones being shot down or captured, it is illegal - Tre' 11:41:29 03/09/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - srdavis2000 09:01:20 03/07/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:53:37 03/07/17 (2)
- Pull...!!! - Dingojazz 12:37:07 03/07/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - srdavis2000 09:08:08 03/07/17 (0)
- RE: Do yu think you have the right to capture or damage a drone flying over your property? - Inmate51 08:16:35 03/07/17 (0)