In Reply to: RE: USB clocking for 44.1k? posted by Dynobot on March 4, 2017 at 08:47:39:
Hi,
> Is it possible to slave the USB Bit-Bucket clock and the Audio
> Bit-Bucket clock to 'one' master clock?
That is called "Asynchronous USB Audio".
It actually does not directly slave the clocks (that is not possible in that sense), but it makes sure the audio clocks determine audio timing.
Modern mixed signal system routinely have multiple clocks and the wide variety of clocks needed does not make synchronisation across all clocks feasible.
The important part then becomes to make sure each individual clock is correct for the job and performs adequately and that the audio conversion uses one high quality clock after a short memory buffer (to handle any data flow control).
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: USB clocking for 44.1k? - Thorsten 20:30:32 03/05/17 (5)
- RE: USB clocking for 44.1k? - Dynobot 06:08:05 03/06/17 (1)
- RE: USB clocking for 44.1k? - Thorsten 08:42:21 03/06/17 (0)
- RE: USB clocking for 44.1k? - Dynobot 05:12:47 03/06/17 (2)
- RE: USB clocking for 44.1k? - Thorsten 08:21:56 03/06/17 (1)
- Ahhhh Great Info THANKS!!!nt - Dynobot 08:32:26 03/06/17 (0)