In Reply to: RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? posted by RGA on March 5, 2017 at 20:53:38:
I agree - and you're with the vast majority of reviewers.Vinyl lovers claim LP is 'easier to listen to'. But live music doesn't have speed variation, needle drag and belt resonance.
With perfect speed control and flat frequency response, digital is a good place to start. A reviewer can understand his components better (by removing a wildly-variant source -LP).
There's almost no worry of microphony, esp. with servers. You get more bass and treble. At least digital tries to do highs -LP cuts them off at 15 khz.
More dynamic range, less surface noise. And you *always* get the best copy (of recording). Can we say that with LP ?
It's quite hard to find *any* problem with digital/red book these days !!
Edits: 03/06/17 03/06/17 03/09/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - J. Phelan 16:17:53 03/06/17 (7)
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - A.Wayne 07:12:31 03/09/17 (0)
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - RGA 18:39:12 03/06/17 (5)
- RE: The Sound of Silence - House13 09:05:05 03/14/17 (0)
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - A.Wayne 07:27:46 03/09/17 (3)
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - RGA 16:59:39 03/09/17 (2)
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - A.Wayne 08:59:37 03/10/17 (1)
- RE: Reviewers with LP - how many are there ? - RGA 23:34:04 03/15/17 (0)