In Reply to: RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! posted by josh358 on May 30, 2012 at 15:17:25:
I have been using a TC Electronics Impact Twin for recording LP's for quite a while now and I have been thoroughly satisfied. It has low noise, and produces a high resolution recording. If it is on the LP, it will put it on the computer. It was one of the recommended units by Pure Vinyl. They worked with it extensively and found it to be very adequate for recording.
I use it for a DAC for playing the recordings as well. It is pretty decent. Of course, I don't have another DAC other than my Sunfire to compare it to. It would not suffice for a crossover, but it has a big brother which I believe is a bit better quality, called the Konneckt 48.
http://www.tcelectronic.com/studiokonnekt48.asp The Konneckt has 12 analogue ins and outs, and can be purchased new for about the same as an RME with 8 channels, maybe a bit less. Take a look if you will. I think something like this would fill the bill. What do you think?
I am also going to check around and call Pure Vinyl to see if they've used it. I am going to follow your lead and try to get an "impression" of this unit.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:59:13 05/30/12 (38)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 20:04:43 05/30/12 (37)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 12:18:21 05/31/12 (36)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 12:59:40 05/31/12 (35)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 14:48:38 05/31/12 (34)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 15:09:47 05/31/12 (33)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - Norman M 10:28:55 06/01/12 (28)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 13:14:03 06/01/12 (27)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - Norman M 08:50:18 06/02/12 (26)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 10:26:53 06/02/12 (25)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 13:16:15 06/02/12 (24)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 14:07:51 06/02/12 (23)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 13:33:54 06/18/12 (3)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 16:56:05 06/18/12 (2)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:42:52 06/18/12 (1)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 19:30:48 06/18/12 (0)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 11:23:27 06/03/12 (18)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:14:05 06/03/12 (17)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 14:26:55 06/04/12 (15)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 15:19:04 06/04/12 (14)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 17:24:25 06/04/12 (13)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:18:23 06/04/12 (12)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 19:38:44 06/04/12 (11)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 19:50:40 06/04/12 (10)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 19:59:46 06/04/12 (9)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:45:31 06/05/12 (8)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 19:09:28 06/05/12 (7)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 19:33:37 06/05/12 (6)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 10:29:06 06/06/12 (5)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 10:39:04 06/06/12 (4)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 10:52:07 06/06/12 (3)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 16:46:48 06/06/12 (2)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 17:15:31 06/06/12 (1)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:04:01 06/06/12 (0)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:41:07 06/03/12 (0)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:56:25 05/31/12 (3)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 08:09:02 06/01/12 (2)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 10:19:30 06/01/12 (1)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 07:03:26 06/02/12 (0)