In Reply to: RE: this seems to work posted by Dawnrazor on October 4, 2011 at 07:37:44:
I have a notebook in which I have a range of setups that I've tried. Putting things back where they were isn't a problem, so why not experiment? Having tried the sideways (of which, I guess, I considered the Rooze a variation), I knew better than to doubt this. My only doubts were about my room configuration, but it doesn't seem to be a problem.
As I mentioned, when I get this 'nailed down', I want to put the 3.7s back where they were for a comparative listen. There's something more 'relaxed' about the sound of this arrangement. I rather like it, but then I also liked the sound of my MMGs turned sideways - that was just impractical for the living room. This is workable - actually seems less crowded too.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- the only cost is time (and I have lots of that (I hope ;-)) - wazoo 10:32:18 10/04/11 (18)
- RE: the only cost is time (and I have lots of that (I hope ;-)) - josh358 18:24:20 10/04/11 (17)
- absolutely (new hardware 'installed') - wazoo 19:06:05 10/04/11 (12)
- RE: absolutely (new hardware 'installed') - Utley1 16:12:29 10/10/11 (1)
- tit for tat - wazoo 08:01:11 10/11/11 (0)
- RE: absolutely (new hardware 'installed') - josh358 19:17:02 10/04/11 (9)
- ouch - wazoo 20:49:00 10/04/11 (8)
- RE: ouch - josh358 07:19:37 10/05/11 (7)
- RE: ouch - Satie 00:42:14 10/06/11 (4)
- RE: ouch - josh358 05:00:50 10/06/11 (0)
- Bad 1.7s - tyu 03:57:06 10/06/11 (2)
- RE: Bad 1.7s - Satie 09:50:26 10/06/11 (1)
- RE: Bad 1.7s - tyu 09:59:51 10/06/11 (0)
- RE: ouch - Dawnrazor 22:21:00 10/05/11 (1)
- RE: ouch - josh358 04:52:10 10/06/11 (0)
- RE: the only cost is time (and I have lots of that (I hope ;-)) - ahendler 18:45:38 10/04/11 (3)
- RE: the only cost is time (and I have lots of that (I hope ;-)) - josh358 19:11:27 10/04/11 (2)
- RE: the only cost is time (and I have lots of that (I hope ;-)) - Dawnrazor 17:10:14 10/05/11 (1)
- RE: the only cost is time (and I have lots of that (I hope ;-)) - josh358 17:16:35 10/05/11 (0)