RE: "fine products"

Posted by gkargreen (A) on May 10, 2017 at 08:34:40

In Reply to: RE: "fine products" posted by 1973shovel on May 10, 2017 at 05:30:14:

shovel, I wasn't totally throwing you under the bus here, that post was mostly directed towards airtime, who has this habit on AA of making comments with little technological reasons to back it, i.e., uninformed responses. You, OTOH, had something solid to offer (although you did come off a bit strong on the anti-ebay thing) an that is appreciated. There was a post that was deleted by airtime right after posting that was incredibly, ah, less than attractive, he realized that and quickly removed it to his credit. In my two previous rebuilds I rebuilt the PC10 boards and believe them to be better than these new boards due to component quality, that being said, these boards are not junk and I would use them again if pressed. Dave's boards I believe are a better design and would go that route first, I can also control parts quality. The costs would be the same, but stuffing the boards would add several more hours to the project and thus cut into my profit on these repairs/restorations, which is something I need to keep in mind. Thanks!

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - gkargreen 18:55:36 05/06/17 (20)

I just wanted to add this to the conversation - airtime 11:44:39 05/09/17 (6)

RE: I just wanted to add this to the conversation - DannyR 18:03:26 05/11/17 (1)

RE: I just wanted to add this to the conversation - airtime 19:48:21 05/11/17 (0)

I agree with you in theory - 1973shovel 13:31:40 05/09/17 (3)

just so you know... - gkargreen 19:40:14 05/09/17 (2)

RE: "fine products" - 1973shovel 05:30:14 05/10/17 (1)

RE: "fine products" - gkargreen 08:34:40 05/10/17 (0)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - DannyR 21:46:29 05/08/17 (4)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - gkargreen 04:54:41 05/09/17 (3)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - DannyR 12:38:49 05/09/17 (2)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - gkargreen 17:54:13 05/09/17 (1)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - DannyR 11:19:32 05/10/17 (0)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - Eli Duttman 12:01:38 05/07/17 (1)

"IIRC, no parts value changes are associated with the switch from 7199 to 6GH8" - 1973shovel 08:25:56 05/08/17 (0)

Maybe this will help - 1973shovel 08:54:09 05/07/17 (3)

RE: Maybe this will help - gkargreen 10:58:16 05/07/17 (2)

RE: "even though the boards are not quite the same as Dave's design" - 1973shovel 11:16:45 05/08/17 (1)

RE: "even though the boards are not quite the same as Dave's design" - gkargreen 12:51:03 05/08/17 (0)

Dynaco Doctor - Uncle Mike 05:37:17 05/07/17 (0)

RE: Dynaco SCA-35 replacement boards problem... - airtime 19:30:43 05/06/17 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: "fine products" - gkargreen 08:34:40 05/10/17 (0)

RE: "fine products"

Post a Message!