In Reply to: RE: My MX110x refurb, before and after posted by GRH on April 27, 2017 at 16:18:48:
The third would be JH.
I'm looking at the label on the box for mine, and it says,
JH Formula 4 Laboratory Standard Tone Arm
J.H. Reproducer Co.
If I recall, there was talk of lawsuits thrown about, trying to sort out who owned what. I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me that actually making the word "Reproducer" part of your company name is implied guilt!
It looks like your Sonus has the same "bucket of BBs" anti-skate system that my JH does. Bucket of BBs isn't my term, but I recall reading it in a negative comment that Mayware made in a letter to the Absolute Sound, while denouncing the JH as inferior to their arm. TAS didn't seem to think so, and wrote that the JH sounded better than the Mayware.
A bit of FYI for the Asylum archives, just in case somebody twenty years from now is looking for this information.
Beautiful job on that MX110x, by the way!
"Suddenly, I'm not half the man I used to be. 'Cause now I'm an amputee" J. LennonThis post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - My MX110x refurb, before and after - GRH 16:52:21 04/26/17 (9)
- Absolutely Nice work!!! Great tube preamp in my experience! - spindoctor 16:09:04 04/28/17 (0)
- RE: My MX110x refurb, before and after - docw 15:19:30 04/27/17 (4)
- RE: My MX110x refurb, before and after - GRH 16:18:48 04/27/17 (3)
- RE: My MX110x refurb, before and after - Michael Samra 17:04:47 04/26/17 (2)