In Reply to: Re: a UHF-VHF antenna is a VERY broadband device :-) posted by dudeupshaw@cogeco.ca on August 10, 2006 at 21:41:01:
... dude! Have been usin' a Weingard antenna for 23 years & counting, & it does just fine on f.m. reception. Did a superb job of receiving Bay Area stations, until that 1985 proliferation of broadcasting antennas in Walnut Grove splattered a blanket of r.f.i. across the spectrum. That Weingard does a decent job negating KNCO's co-channel interference on 94.1 mhz when listening to Berkeley's KPFA. Just remember ya gotta throw an antenna rotater into da mix. 73s from Sactown!!!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Don't Believe That Hype ... - FRG7SWL 09:10:01 08/12/06 (8)
- Re: Don't Believe That Hype ... - dudeupshaw@cogeco.ca 00:07:03 08/13/06 (7)
- Re: Don't Believe That Hype ... - FRG7SWL 09:31:24 08/14/06 (6)
- No mention of sound quality in your comments - dudeupshaw@cogeco.ca 16:45:24 08/14/06 (5)
- Erik - Randy 09:36:03 02/02/07 (0)
- Antennas provide signal strength, not sound quality. - Markw* 04:36:59 08/15/06 (3)
- Twaddle, and WRONG - first up, what's 'enough signal?' - Timbo in Oz 23:06:59 08/17/06 (0)
- Re: Sound Quality's ... - FRG7SWL 13:57:29 08/15/06 (1)
- I've always said... - Markw* 17:56:25 08/15/06 (0)