In Reply to: "Scott 850D" posted by 1973shovel on August 10, 2019 at 07:08:47:
That's because I wrote "850" instead of the correct "350 D" as I should have. Sorry about that. It was completely refurbished one year ago by Mapleshade (which means a gentleman who is a Scott expert whose name I forgot).
It was sounding great as I left, and now still sounds great, plus a low level hum that occurs with none of my other sources. I suppose that even though it was refurbished, it could still have a bum tube.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Scott 850D" - torc 17:40:39 08/10/19 (1)
- Ahh - 1973shovel 05:23:46 08/12/19 (0)