In Reply to: Re: Back to the Drawing Board.... posted by groverg on December 26, 2004 at 14:44:30:
Well, it went about twice as long this time, so I guess we are making progress :) . I took the resistor out and took the CT to ground and I adjusted the bias so that it read -110 between the grid and the filament of the 845. I ran it for about 7 minutes with the preamp out and everything seemed ok so I decided to put the preamp back in. It ran for about 5 minutes with the preamp in before making the noise. Guess I had better go back and let it run 20 minutes or more with the preamp out and see if it goes bonkers then. The thing I don't understand is why it doesn't start making the noise right away. Why does it run awhile first?
I'll report back after running it without the preamp for awhile longer.
Vince
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Back to the Drawing Board.... - Vinnie 15:24:54 12/26/04 (13)
- Re: Sheeesh! - Vinnie 16:29:53 12/26/04 (0)
- Looks like we got a preamp problem... - Vinnie 16:12:24 12/26/04 (11)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - groverg 17:21:28 12/26/04 (10)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - Vinnie 18:39:56 12/26/04 (4)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - groverg 20:06:47 12/26/04 (3)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - Vinnie 05:51:55 12/27/04 (2)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - groverg 09:23:56 12/27/04 (1)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - Vinnie 10:38:30 12/27/04 (0)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - groverg 17:25:21 12/26/04 (4)
- Re: Looks like we DON"T have a preamp problem... - Vinnie 11:01:36 12/27/04 (2)
- Re: Looks like we DON"T have a preamp problem... - groverg 11:10:55 12/27/04 (1)
- Re: Looks like we DON"T have a preamp problem... - Vinnie 13:58:53 12/28/04 (0)
- Re: Looks like we got a preamp problem... - Vinnie 17:42:48 12/26/04 (0)