In Reply to: Cathodyne VS LTP posted by Triode_Kingdom on April 30, 2021 at 14:07:58:
It takes a bit of sorting to get 6J6's that match well enough( IMO ) for LTP use. There are Three types, and one is allegedly selected for section-section matching. 6099 I think is one, and 6101 is the other.
cheers,
Douglas
Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - PakProtector 05:09:58 05/01/21 (15)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Triode_Kingdom 06:46:04 05/01/21 (14)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - kyle 09:46:43 05/03/21 (5)
- Thanks, I'll keep it in mind! (nt) - Triode_Kingdom 12:41:06 05/03/21 (4)
- Increasing Gain in Respectable Transconductance 7 Pin Mini Types - Eli Duttman 02:12:57 05/04/21 (3)
- Distortion RE: Increasing Gain in Respectable Transconductance 7 Pin Mini Types - Paul Joppa 07:47:35 05/04/21 (1)
- HK Ratings - Triode_Kingdom 08:43:25 05/04/21 (0)
- RE: Increasing Gain in Respectable Transconductance 7 Pin Mini Types - PakProtector 03:13:43 05/04/21 (0)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Eli Duttman 16:28:47 05/01/21 (7)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Triode_Kingdom 20:22:10 05/01/21 (6)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - rage 11:52:04 05/05/21 (2)
- Choke in the Tail - Triode_Kingdom 23:35:44 05/05/21 (1)
- RE: Choke in the Tail - rage 06:55:38 05/06/21 (0)
- Decision - Triode_Kingdom 23:51:27 05/01/21 (0)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Eli Duttman 23:35:54 05/01/21 (1)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - PakProtector 05:47:03 05/03/21 (0)