In Reply to: RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? posted by walge on April 10, 2021 at 03:09:16:
There is not anything better to do measurments at or near maximum power, it's just an academic measurement wich gives no information about what is better.
A performance measurement at normal listening levels gives me more information. I am not interested in how much heat is generated at low or high frequencies at maximum power although this can be calculated if needed.
So how do you solve the bias current problem in your set-up to measure a SE transformer?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 04:47:27 04/10/21 (20)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 05:10:45 04/10/21 (19)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 05:48:17 04/10/21 (18)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 06:27:36 04/10/21 (17)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 07:20:40 04/10/21 (16)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 07:39:09 04/10/21 (15)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 11:32:10 04/10/21 (14)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 13:02:18 04/10/21 (10)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 14:30:54 04/10/21 (9)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 01:29:27 04/11/21 (8)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 04:27:17 04/11/21 (7)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 05:18:45 04/11/21 (6)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 06:04:07 04/11/21 (5)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 06:59:02 04/11/21 (4)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 07:03:52 04/11/21 (3)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 07:20:34 04/11/21 (2)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 07:34:11 04/11/21 (1)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - kobasa@xs4all.nl 08:17:56 04/11/21 (0)
- RE: 38H OPT for 845, so so? - walge 12:35:14 04/10/21 (2)
- Beautiful Amps! - Triode_Kingdom 12:02:03 04/13/21 (1)
- RE: Beautiful Amps! - walge 07:44:13 04/14/21 (0)