In Reply to: 7199 VS 6AN8 posted by Triode_Kingdom on March 14, 2021 at 13:34:28:
~!
The Mind has No Firewall~ U.S. Army War College.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- what Doug said, save for I opt for 6267 and 5687, not aware of any octals that can match in performance~nT - Cleantimestream 15:43:04 03/14/21 (12)
- Re: 5687 ? - Triode_Kingdom 22:32:52 03/14/21 (9)
- Re: 5687 ? - Stuben 11:05:10 03/19/21 (1)
- Re: 5687 ? - Triode_Kingdom 20:06:38 03/19/21 (0)
- Re: 5687 ? - Eli Duttman 06:39:06 03/16/21 (3)
- Is that the right number? - Triode_Kingdom 09:13:00 03/16/21 (2)
- RE: Is that the right number? - Eli Duttman 10:27:35 03/16/21 (1)
- Thanks, I'll look into it. (nt) - Triode_Kingdom 12:00:55 03/16/21 (0)
- Re: 5687 ? - PakProtector 04:12:31 03/15/21 (2)
- Re: 5687 ? - Triode_Kingdom 07:10:36 03/15/21 (1)
- Re: 5687 ? - PakProtector 08:18:53 03/15/21 (0)
- RE: what Doug said, save for I opt for 6267 and 5687, not aware of any octals that can match in performance~nT - Triode_Kingdom 19:49:53 03/14/21 (0)
- RE: what Doug said, save for I opt for 6267 and 5687, not aware of any octals that can match in performance~nT - PakProtector 17:24:41 03/14/21 (0)