I'm starting a project that involves moving a manufacturer's circuit to a new chassis. It's a straight stereo power amplifier that originally used a 7199 driving a pair of 6L6 types in each channel. I want to maintain the original component values as much as possible, but have decided to ditch the 7199. It's simply becoming too scarce, especially NOS.
I'm looking at several options, including breaking out the two sections of the 7199 as separate tubes in each channel. It's not difficult to find near-exact performance doing it this way. Another option among tubes that have a history of use for hi-fi (rather than TV) would be the 6AN8.
The 6AN8 seems to be more widely available than the 7199, and the specifications don't seem to indicate a downside as a substitute. It's not absolutely identical, but I think it's use as a pentode driving a cathodyne inverter would not require changing the original circuit values.
I'm just wondering if anyone here has made this change to existing gear in order to move away from the 7199, and whether you had any issues. I'll add that I've seen a few 6AN8 tubes that were microphonic, but I don't know how widespread this is. If that's a common trait, I would want to move on to something else.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - 7199 VS 6AN8 - Triode_Kingdom 13:34:28 03/14/21 (35)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - Eli Duttman 01:38:07 03/16/21 (2)
- That Ned Carlson was rather sharp. He MADE Triode what it was.~nT - Cleantimestream 12:48:44 03/16/21 (0)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - Triode_Kingdom 09:05:59 03/16/21 (0)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - Paul Joppa 08:49:19 03/15/21 (3)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - PakProtector 14:40:00 03/15/21 (2)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - Paul Joppa 15:59:36 03/15/21 (1)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - PakProtector 17:32:40 03/15/21 (0)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - elblanco 19:55:43 03/14/21 (3)
- The 7199 has the Nonoise twisted filament. - viridian 20:39:12 03/14/21 (0)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - Triode_Kingdom 20:22:01 03/14/21 (1)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - Story 04:43:02 03/15/21 (0)
- 6GH8/6U8 is more available than 6AN8 NT - Alpha Al 17:34:04 03/14/21 (9)
- RE: 6GH8/6U8 is more available than 6AN8 - Triode_Kingdom 20:00:59 03/14/21 (8)
- RE: 6GH8/6U8 is more available than 6AN8 - Alpha Al 05:57:26 03/15/21 (1)
- RE: 6GH8/6U8 is more available than 6AN8 - Triode_Kingdom 07:07:29 03/15/21 (0)
- Link - viridian 20:35:47 03/14/21 (5)
- Thanks, that was helpful! - Triode_Kingdom 01:04:27 03/15/21 (4)
- RE: Thanks, that was helpful! - Paul Joppa 09:06:40 03/15/21 (1)
- RE: Thanks, that was helpful! - Triode_Kingdom 09:30:54 03/15/21 (0)
- Thank you, I have always appreciated your posts. - viridian 08:47:30 03/15/21 (1)
- RE: Thank you, I have always appreciated your posts. - Triode_Kingdom 09:12:32 03/15/21 (0)
- what Doug said, save for I opt for 6267 and 5687, not aware of any octals that can match in performance~nT - Cleantimestream 15:43:04 03/14/21 (12)
- Re: 5687 ? - Triode_Kingdom 22:32:52 03/14/21 (9)
- Re: 5687 ? - Stuben 11:05:10 03/19/21 (1)
- Re: 5687 ? - Triode_Kingdom 20:06:38 03/19/21 (0)
- Re: 5687 ? - Eli Duttman 06:39:06 03/16/21 (3)
- Is that the right number? - Triode_Kingdom 09:13:00 03/16/21 (2)
- RE: Is that the right number? - Eli Duttman 10:27:35 03/16/21 (1)
- Thanks, I'll look into it. (nt) - Triode_Kingdom 12:00:55 03/16/21 (0)
- Re: 5687 ? - PakProtector 04:12:31 03/15/21 (2)
- Re: 5687 ? - Triode_Kingdom 07:10:36 03/15/21 (1)
- Re: 5687 ? - PakProtector 08:18:53 03/15/21 (0)
- RE: what Doug said, save for I opt for 6267 and 5687, not aware of any octals that can match in performance~nT - Triode_Kingdom 19:49:53 03/14/21 (0)
- RE: what Doug said, save for I opt for 6267 and 5687, not aware of any octals that can match in performance~nT - PakProtector 17:24:41 03/14/21 (0)
- RE: 7199 VS 6AN8 - PakProtector 15:01:59 03/14/21 (0)