In Reply to: RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash posted by Paul Eizik on July 11, 2017 at 07:56:26:
But rather than scrape references to papers online, why don't you address my theory as to why TIM is not a factor on real audio signals?Those papers you recently referenced are for IEEE and AES members. Otherwise you have to pay for them. So again did you read them or just cite the synopsis. Because buried within them may be the answer I am providing.
P.S. I hold membership in IEEE, SMPTE. SBE
Edits: 07/11/17 07/11/17 07/11/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - gusser 10:00:45 07/11/17 (10)
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - Paul Eizik 16:02:29 07/11/17 (9)
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - LinuxGuru 14:57:36 07/12/17 (3)
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - Paul Eizik 19:28:10 07/12/17 (2)
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - LinuxGuru 14:58:15 07/13/17 (1)
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - Paul Eizik 08:04:33 07/14/17 (0)
- RE: Slew rate, TIM hogwwash - gusser 17:30:28 07/11/17 (4)
- RE: Go Gusser! - Paul Eizik 08:11:11 07/12/17 (3)
- RE: Go Gusser! - gusser 10:35:38 07/12/17 (2)
- RE: Good luck with your research and possible JAES paper! nt - Paul Eizik 18:22:23 07/12/17 (1)
- I'll add it to my two published SMPTE papers! (nt) - gusser 09:09:57 07/13/17 (0)