In Reply to: Too low plate R value for a triode ? and CCS substitution? posted by Eric Chan on March 22, 2017 at 07:09:42:
"However the plate resistor is only 1250 ohm which is less than 3 times of 420 parallel section of 6h30."
That helps me understand a lot about a back and forth thread I just had with Victor.
I would never build that way.
If the output swing is low it might be just fine but I run tubes in the most linear way I can, regardless of needed swing.
I think it sounds and measures better that way.
The rule of thumb I use is, "the load impedance for a voltage stage should be 10 times the plate resistance minimum, 20 times is better".
That keeps the load line fairly horizontal and the harmonic distortion low.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Too low plate R value for a triode ? and CCS substitution? - Tre' 21:53:47 03/22/17 (4)
- RE: Too low plate R value for a triode ? and CCS substitution? - Eric Chan 23:10:51 03/22/17 (3)
- RE: Too low plate R value for a triode ? and CCS substitution? - Tre' 07:59:11 03/23/17 (2)
- RE: Too low plate R value for a triode ? and CCS substitution? - dave slagle 10:28:53 03/23/17 (1)
- RE: Too low plate R value for a triode ? and CCS substitution? - Tre' 13:25:27 03/23/17 (0)