In Reply to: RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... posted by Tre' on March 21, 2017 at 21:17:44:
Sure enough! Now, if I can just get
stupider still, I can arrive at the Ultimate
Amplifier-- one that uses NONE of your
1960's electronic theories!
Actually, that won't be entirely possible.
You're an excellent electronics theory man,
and believe it or not, I have learned some
from your posts.
I do, however, get off of the Standard City Rail,
if I decide that the roads running through the
Woods will work better!
Oh, I understand! Original thinking means that
I'm--- oh, what the Heck! Just call me stupid!
-Dennis-
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - tube wrangler 22:44:30 03/21/17 (51)
- Theory Man? - gusser 10:49:50 03/22/17 (18)
- Funny you should mention Sal Marantz - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 14:05:02 03/22/17 (3)
- Saul Bernard - drlowmu 20:50:53 03/23/17 (0)
- Saul not "Sal"... - Steve O 14:49:57 03/22/17 (0)
- And neither was David Sarnoff! - gusser 14:25:46 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Theory Man? - TomWh 13:02:04 03/22/17 (10)
- plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - gusser 13:37:00 03/22/17 (3)
- RE: plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - dave slagle 10:41:59 03/23/17 (2)
- RE: plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - gusser 14:34:11 03/23/17 (0)
- RE: plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - drlowmu 11:32:24 03/23/17 (0)
- Huh? - gusser 13:31:04 03/22/17 (5)
- Of course I have! - Jim Dowdy 14:30:41 03/22/17 (2)
- Absolutly! - gusser 14:40:39 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: Absolutly! - dave slagle 06:26:01 03/23/17 (0)
- RE: Huh? - TomWh 13:56:56 03/22/17 (1)
- Why not? - gusser 14:14:58 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Theory Man? - PakProtector 11:17:33 03/22/17 (2)
- RE: Theory Man? - Eli Duttman 11:49:11 03/22/17 (0)
- So he says? - gusser 11:22:44 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - Tre' 08:03:43 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - tube wrangler 17:36:50 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - PakProtector 04:13:51 03/22/17 (29)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - RPMac 05:55:56 03/22/17 (28)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - gusser 10:07:17 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - TomWh 08:49:43 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - RPMac 15:30:39 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - cpotl 06:47:34 03/22/17 (24)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - gusser 11:12:02 03/22/17 (23)
- May be true, but for a different reason. - sser2 19:22:17 03/23/17 (0)
- What????????????????????????????????? - TomWh 12:10:57 03/22/17 (20)
- Have you figured out your scope yet? - gusser 12:21:50 03/22/17 (19)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - TomWh 13:44:06 03/22/17 (17)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - Tre' 17:50:01 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - gusser 13:58:27 03/22/17 (15)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - sideliner 16:02:54 03/22/17 (14)
- It's not a cop out! - gusser 17:01:42 03/22/17 (13)
- RE: It's not a cop out! - TomWh 18:31:51 03/22/17 (8)
- I'm not following you! - gusser 18:51:46 03/22/17 (7)
- RE: I'm not following you! - Tre' 19:47:26 03/22/17 (6)
- RE: I'm not following you! - TomWh 20:59:24 03/22/17 (5)
- Hmm, well Richard C. Heyser's pay grade is far above anyone here and he said... - Cleantimestream 00:56:33 03/25/17 (0)
- RE: I'm not following you! - Tre' 23:07:14 03/24/17 (2)
- RE: I'm not following you! - TomWh 08:23:30 03/25/17 (1)
- RE: I'm not following you! - cpotl 14:58:55 03/25/17 (0)
- Not back peddling at all! - gusser 22:16:02 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: It's not a cop out! - sideliner 18:23:47 03/22/17 (3)
- State of the art is perfect? - gusser 18:37:52 03/22/17 (2)
- RE: State of the art is perfect? - sideliner 21:09:03 03/22/17 (1)
- But consider this? - gusser 22:45:38 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - Eli Duttman 12:34:27 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - Eli Duttman 12:03:37 03/22/17 (0)