In Reply to: RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... posted by tube wrangler on March 21, 2017 at 20:43:58:
"Basically, push/pull is a processor in that it
possesses Common-Mode (any voltage that is common to
both sides of a differential circuit) Rejection,
called CMR by engineers."No, push pull rejects any even ordered distortion created by the push pull (differential) circuit. It will not cancel any of the input signal.
"It is just common sense that this same circuitry
will also cancel-out any form of musical expression
that also occurs in the Common Mode."There is no musical expression picked up by the microphone that occurs in the common mode.
The diaphragm outputs a single ended signal and it drives a single ended circuit that is coupled to the mic-pre through a output transformer who's secondary is connected through a balanced connection (that cannot cancel common mode signal because there is no such thing as common mode signal) to the input transformer of the mic-pre (that cannot cancel common mode signal because there is no such thing as common mode signal).
What a balanced connection does cancel is any noise picked up by the wire along the way, not the music signal or any part of the music signal.
Dennis, with every post you show more and more of your lack of understanding of how audio electronics work.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Edits: 03/21/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - Tre' 21:17:44 03/21/17 (52)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - tube wrangler 22:44:30 03/21/17 (51)
- Theory Man? - gusser 10:49:50 03/22/17 (18)
- Funny you should mention Sal Marantz - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 14:05:02 03/22/17 (3)
- Saul Bernard - drlowmu 20:50:53 03/23/17 (0)
- Saul not "Sal"... - Steve O 14:49:57 03/22/17 (0)
- And neither was David Sarnoff! - gusser 14:25:46 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Theory Man? - TomWh 13:02:04 03/22/17 (10)
- plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - gusser 13:37:00 03/22/17 (3)
- RE: plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - dave slagle 10:41:59 03/23/17 (2)
- RE: plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - gusser 14:34:11 03/23/17 (0)
- RE: plenty of farmers who make way pass your salary. - drlowmu 11:32:24 03/23/17 (0)
- Huh? - gusser 13:31:04 03/22/17 (5)
- Of course I have! - Jim Dowdy 14:30:41 03/22/17 (2)
- Absolutly! - gusser 14:40:39 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: Absolutly! - dave slagle 06:26:01 03/23/17 (0)
- RE: Huh? - TomWh 13:56:56 03/22/17 (1)
- Why not? - gusser 14:14:58 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Theory Man? - PakProtector 11:17:33 03/22/17 (2)
- RE: Theory Man? - Eli Duttman 11:49:11 03/22/17 (0)
- So he says? - gusser 11:22:44 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - Tre' 08:03:43 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - tube wrangler 17:36:50 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - PakProtector 04:13:51 03/22/17 (29)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - RPMac 05:55:56 03/22/17 (28)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - gusser 10:07:17 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - TomWh 08:49:43 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - RPMac 15:30:39 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - cpotl 06:47:34 03/22/17 (24)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - gusser 11:12:02 03/22/17 (23)
- May be true, but for a different reason. - sser2 19:22:17 03/23/17 (0)
- What????????????????????????????????? - TomWh 12:10:57 03/22/17 (20)
- Have you figured out your scope yet? - gusser 12:21:50 03/22/17 (19)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - TomWh 13:44:06 03/22/17 (17)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - Tre' 17:50:01 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - gusser 13:58:27 03/22/17 (15)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - sideliner 16:02:54 03/22/17 (14)
- It's not a cop out! - gusser 17:01:42 03/22/17 (13)
- RE: It's not a cop out! - TomWh 18:31:51 03/22/17 (8)
- I'm not following you! - gusser 18:51:46 03/22/17 (7)
- RE: I'm not following you! - Tre' 19:47:26 03/22/17 (6)
- RE: I'm not following you! - TomWh 20:59:24 03/22/17 (5)
- Hmm, well Richard C. Heyser's pay grade is far above anyone here and he said... - Cleantimestream 00:56:33 03/25/17 (0)
- RE: I'm not following you! - Tre' 23:07:14 03/24/17 (2)
- RE: I'm not following you! - TomWh 08:23:30 03/25/17 (1)
- RE: I'm not following you! - cpotl 14:58:55 03/25/17 (0)
- Not back peddling at all! - gusser 22:16:02 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: It's not a cop out! - sideliner 18:23:47 03/22/17 (3)
- State of the art is perfect? - gusser 18:37:52 03/22/17 (2)
- RE: State of the art is perfect? - sideliner 21:09:03 03/22/17 (1)
- But consider this? - gusser 22:45:38 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Have you figured out your scope yet? - Eli Duttman 12:34:27 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: What an astonishingly insightful (and iconoclastic) assessment of some formerly revered designs.... - Eli Duttman 12:03:37 03/22/17 (0)