In Reply to: "frequency compensation" and "sound shaping" posted by Lew on July 8, 2015 at 07:58:13:
These terms are very revealing of your goals. That's perfectly OK, but many do not share those goals. And those goals are not attainable without introduction of "colorations" that most of us would like to avoid. (Coloration seems to be one of your goals, on the other hand.)
That is the conclusion I have arrived at as well. Although ultimate neutrality is not my primary goal, I'd still like to avoid gross colouration and maintain acceptable transparency, while achieving other goals.
Cheers,
91.
"Confusion of goals and perfection of means seems to characterise our age." Albert Einstein
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "frequency compensation" and "sound shaping" - 91derlust 19:35:53 07/09/15 (9)
- RE: "frequency compensation" and "sound shaping" - drlowmu 22:35:26 07/09/15 (8)
- Jeff, we are done. - 91derlust 16:06:05 07/10/15 (0)
- RE: "frequency compensation" and "sound shaping" - elblanco 12:09:45 07/10/15 (5)
- RE: "frequency compensation" and "sound shaping" - rage 14:42:22 07/10/15 (4)
- RE: 19KHz ... - deathtube 667 06:47:00 07/13/15 (3)
- RE: 19KHz ... - rage 06:53:26 07/13/15 (2)
- RE: excessive distortion ... - deathtube 667 07:05:27 07/13/15 (1)
- RE: excessive distortion ... - rage 07:39:11 07/13/15 (0)
- That's perfectly OK, too. - Lew 07:34:34 07/10/15 (0)