In Reply to: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours posted by drlowmu on March 11, 2011 at 17:50:18:
But regardless of our listening preferences or priorities, don't you agree that when we make our cases on the public forum that the arguments should be logically and factually consistent? If we post a technical argument, shouldn't that argument be technically valid, regardless of which side we're trying to defend?
In other words, if we have opposing points of view, but we both use technical arguments to defend our positions, if I make valid technical arguments, does that mean, necessarily, that you have to make invalid ones?
So the "parallel resistor" analogy is just wrong. Accepting that fact doesn't mean you're on my side. It just means you need to find a better technical argument to defend your position. Doing so would raise the quality of debate for everyone. And, heck, you might learn something.
Do you see the point?
-Henry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - op48no1 19:32:50 03/11/11 (3)
- RE: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - drlowmu 00:00:21 03/14/11 (2)
- RE: Whats the prioity, mine is different than yours - Ray Moth 00:54:16 03/14/11 (1)
- Excessive, - drlowmu 07:31:11 03/14/11 (0)