In Reply to: Re: Thats superb. posted by drlowmu on April 23, 2007 at 13:33:53:
... until Dave S had "questioned" you on your choice of materials, you had presented a solution that in fact was marginal at best in its execution and admitted by yourself to be untested in its current configuration. Your "listening" test being with completely different materials. It makes you think how many other of your presentations and test results are similarly flawed.Oh and don't worry about RDH4. It's all there on pages 784 to 786. I mean, all the stuff you and Dennis have been talking about - layout, screening (which is all your plates are).
I myself have done much experimentation in this regard but I found other materials better suited. I don't doubt you have heard what you report. It just isn't news and is well documented if you care to look for it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- In fact ... - Stephen R 14:28:12 04/23/07 (2)
- Re: In fact ... - drlowmu 18:47:56 04/23/07 (1)
- oops ... - Stephen R 04:12:28 04/25/07 (0)