In Reply to: Re: Citation II posted by Jim McShane on March 19, 2007 at 06:21:20:
>I'm confident the choice was made for performance reasons.Which of HK's product specifications improved as a result of applying the UL technique? If the answer is "none," and if you're correct that this wasn't market-driven, then perhaps it was just an excercise in innovation. Engineers do that sometimes.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Triode_Kingdom 08:17:54 03/19/07 (9)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 08:51:17 03/19/07 (8)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Triode_Kingdom 21:04:06 03/19/07 (5)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 07:16:08 03/20/07 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 06:45:45 03/20/07 (0)
- Re: What UL did better for Citation II - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 04:14:01 03/20/07 (2)
- Nonsense - Triode_Kingdom 06:22:08 03/20/07 (1)
- Re: Nonsense - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 10:19:14 03/20/07 (0)
- Was the reason because when the transformers he ordered were delivered - Ivan303 17:46:05 03/19/07 (1)
- Re: Was the reason because when the transformers he ordered were delivered - Jim McShane 19:14:27 03/19/07 (0)