In Reply to: Citation II posted by Triode_Kingdom on March 18, 2007 at 21:29:32:
So you are saying what here? It can't work well? The Cit II is no good?Look at the marketing material of the day (you can see a 1961 brochure on my site if you want). There was no mention of UL or "distributed load" except in the spec sheet where it describes the output section in just a few words.
I'm confident the choice was made for performance reasons. There is virtually nothing about a Cit II that followed the trends of the day, there's no reason to believe the UL output was an exception to that.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Citation II - Jim McShane 06:21:20 03/19/07 (10)
- Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Triode_Kingdom 08:17:54 03/19/07 (9)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 08:51:17 03/19/07 (8)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Triode_Kingdom 21:04:06 03/19/07 (5)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 07:16:08 03/20/07 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 06:45:45 03/20/07 (0)
- Re: What UL did better for Citation II - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 04:14:01 03/20/07 (2)
- Nonsense - Triode_Kingdom 06:22:08 03/20/07 (1)
- Re: Nonsense - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 10:19:14 03/20/07 (0)
- Was the reason because when the transformers he ordered were delivered - Ivan303 17:46:05 03/19/07 (1)
- Re: Was the reason because when the transformers he ordered were delivered - Jim McShane 19:14:27 03/19/07 (0)