In Reply to: Re: UL is cheaper than properly implemented true pentode. posted by Jim McShane on March 18, 2007 at 19:03:01:
>And if U/L is just cheaper and offers no advantages, why do you think Stu Hegeman used it in the Cit II?Not all new topologies are implemented for sonic superiority. The popularity of UL had as much to do with marketing as anything else.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Citation II - Triode_Kingdom 21:29:32 03/18/07 (11)
- Re: Citation II - Jim McShane 06:21:20 03/19/07 (10)
- Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Triode_Kingdom 08:17:54 03/19/07 (9)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 08:51:17 03/19/07 (8)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Triode_Kingdom 21:04:06 03/19/07 (5)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 07:16:08 03/20/07 (0)
- Re: Sorry, I don't see the basis for your statement.. - Jim McShane 06:45:45 03/20/07 (0)
- Re: What UL did better for Citation II - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 04:14:01 03/20/07 (2)
- Nonsense - Triode_Kingdom 06:22:08 03/20/07 (1)
- Re: Nonsense - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 10:19:14 03/20/07 (0)
- Was the reason because when the transformers he ordered were delivered - Ivan303 17:46:05 03/19/07 (1)
- Re: Was the reason because when the transformers he ordered were delivered - Jim McShane 19:14:27 03/19/07 (0)