Re: Well, well, well..............Holy Unholy Juxtaposition Batman!!!

Posted by Steve O (A) on March 7, 2007 at 11:16:49

In Reply to: Well, well, well.............. posted by drlowmu on March 6, 2007 at 22:22:16:

Albert, Jeff and Dennis in the same paragraph!

I believe there are some major misconceptions here. Einsteinâ€™s theories were built upon the solid work of others. His theories were also thoroughly reviewed and largely validated by his peers. And Albert wasnâ€™t always right either. His reluctance to accept quantum theory is well documented.

Dennisâ€™ claim about mercury migration thru glass are based on who-knows-what and appear to remain unvalidated by anyone/thing at this time. If mercury migration thru glass is an issue, it should be well documented in the scientific and industrial literature of the past century. It should also be easy to verify experimentally. Therefore, a (very) little research should be able to verify everything and be citable. Since you and Dennis make the novel claim, you and Dennis should do the research or develop the experiment that proves the claim. Publish the details of your research or experiment and others will be able to verify it independently. Without this your claim is nothing more than unsubstantiated opinion.

As an aside, realize that if what you and Dennis claim is correct and becomes the accepted truth, the fluorescent lighting industry will be destroyed, worldwide energy use will increase and global warming will be accelerated putting human existence on the brink. Who wouldâ€™a thunk it?

Actually, it seems to me like you and Dennis are making all this up as you go. You also seem to be caught in the feel-good trap of believing that all ideas and concepts are equally valid until proven otherwise. Tough as it may be to accept, the ideas of some are more valid than the ideas of others.

See ya!

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Ping GregBKC Damper Diodes - Slick 04:58:38 03/05/07 (19)

Re: Ping GregBKC Damper Diodes - Tom Bavis 11:58:03 03/05/07 (1)

Re: Ping GregBKC Damper Diodes - Slick 12:53:07 03/05/07 (0)

Greg will respond.............. - drlowmu 09:46:37 03/05/07 (16)

Let go of it, would you please? - mikeyb 14:35:31 03/05/07 (15)

Jeff, would you respond to this? - Russ57 15:37:55 03/05/07 (14)

Re: Jeff, would you respond to this? - drlowmu 19:43:09 03/05/07 (12)

By this logic - mikeyb 05:41:50 03/06/07 (1)

Re: By this logic - drlowmu 08:29:17 03/06/07 (0)

Thanks, nice to know someone else likes the 5u4 too(nt) - Russ57 05:38:12 03/06/07 (0)

Completely false - Mark Kelly 20:10:52 03/05/07 (0)

mecrury tubes - Janos 20:05:45 03/05/07 (7)

Re: mecrury tubes - drlowmu 22:47:45 03/05/07 (6)

hmm... - Dave Cigna 12:46:03 03/09/07 (0)

Re: mecrury tubes - Janos 18:23:11 03/06/07 (0)

Citing oneself as a reference is poor form... - Steve O 16:39:41 03/06/07 (3)

Well, well, well.............. - drlowmu 22:22:16 03/06/07 (2)

Re: Well, well, well..............Holy Unholy Juxtaposition Batman!!! - Steve O 11:16:49 03/07/07 (0)

So you're comparing yourself you Einstein now? - arend-jan 05:06:22 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Jeff, would you respond to this? - mikeyb 16:26:19 03/05/07 (1)

Follow Ups

Re: Well, well, well..............Holy Unholy Juxtaposition Batman!!! - Steve O 11:16:49 03/07/07 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.