In Reply to: Sorry, your textbook quote can't help me this time. posted by cheap-Jack on February 27, 2007 at 09:16:59:
The post above was from my own personal experience as an engineer.If you drop the attitude and are willing to engage in dialog instead of diatribe may be the folks around here would be more inclined to help you out and examine the problem you're describing.
Care to post those IEEE papers so others can read them as well?
regards,
-- josé k.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - cheap-Jack 12:44:05 02/26/07 (82)
- Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - bpur 00:14:37 03/01/07 (0)
- Try a car battery. - Pete Millett 00:22:10 02/28/07 (8)
- Thanks yr concern to an "idiot" like me. - cheap-Jack 08:11:45 02/28/07 (7)
- Re: Speaking of such - Ron Oehlert 09:28:01 02/28/07 (6)
- So where to post you think would be more appropriate ? - cheap-Jack 10:51:25 02/28/07 (5)
- should "tube diy" readers start discussing cables/speaker/etc in this forum section because they are capable? - jarthel 21:57:15 02/28/07 (1)
- No, strictly speaking, they should not. - cheap-Jack 07:41:33 03/01/07 (0)
- all these irrelevant stirrup - Russ57 13:50:56 02/28/07 (2)
- How "much better" today's cap performance ? - cheap-Jack 12:57:38 03/01/07 (0)
- Let me clarify ... (very long) - cheap-Jack 08:42:39 03/01/07 (0)
- is this suitable for high voltage applications since this was posted in "Tubes DIY"? - jarthel 21:54:46 02/27/07 (2)
- Why? - cheap-Jack 10:37:49 02/28/07 (1)
- Correction: "double" capacitance should read "half". (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:36:41 03/01/07 (0)
- I have the John Curl 1978 IEEE Paper - email me for a copy... - korneluk 14:31:47 02/27/07 (9)
- I can only fax it over. Likewise, John Curl faxed it to me. (nt) - cheap-Jack 09:05:06 02/28/07 (8)
- Email me for a soft copy in PDF format if you would like. (nt) - korneluk 10:48:31 02/28/07 (7)
- Why not ask John direct? - cheap-Jack 10:59:16 02/28/07 (6)
- I was offering you a soft copy which I downloaded... - korneluk 11:16:00 02/28/07 (5)
- Hi, I have not received your email download. (nt) - cheap-Jack 08:45:08 03/01/07 (3)
- I need your email address - korneluk 09:55:35 03/01/07 (2)
- I just got it. Thanks. - cheap-Jack 15:34:04 03/01/07 (0)
- Just emailed you. (nt) - cheap-Jack 15:07:29 03/01/07 (0)
- Just emailed over. - cheap-Jack 11:27:52 02/28/07 (0)
- Not according to this video clip - fatbottle 09:04:20 02/27/07 (15)
- So John Curl farted around in his IEEE papers, or you ? - cheap-Jack 09:29:28 02/27/07 (14)
- Re: So John Curl farted around in his IEEE papers, or you ? - Tre' 09:57:43 02/27/07 (11)
- Nope, I hold no "position" at all. - cheap-Jack 10:59:28 02/27/07 (10)
- a solution - Dave Cigna 13:52:06 02/27/07 (7)
- Yes, it works as John Curl already hinted. - cheap-Jack 08:57:37 02/28/07 (0)
- Yes! Ignore this thread!! :-) nt - Stephen R 05:21:53 02/28/07 (0)
- Re: a solution - corerosin 01:49:58 02/28/07 (3)
- This is something sensible I want to read. - cheap-Jack 08:49:43 02/28/07 (2)
- Re: This is something sensible I want to read. - corerosin 12:08:31 02/28/07 (1)
- I agree to your sensible reply. - cheap-Jack 12:25:13 02/28/07 (0)
- Dave, that's perfect in this case. (nt) - Tre' 15:51:00 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: Nope, I hold no "position" at all. - Tre' 11:31:32 02/27/07 (1)
- Here is my argument. - cheap-Jack 11:58:16 02/27/07 (1)
- ? - fatbottle 09:56:03 02/27/07 (1)
- Talk sense, farter ! - cheap-Jack 10:37:40 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - Lew 07:09:18 02/27/07 (0)
- Jack - you are a whoose! - Allen Wright 04:57:15 02/27/07 (9)
- Very amusing, far better than my "whoose" talk. - cheap-Jack 08:14:05 02/27/07 (2)
- I do it accidentially often enough to not need to do it on purpose! (nt) - Allen Wright 05:39:27 02/28/07 (1)
- Allen, glad you still want to talk to an "idiot" like me. (nt) - cheap-Jack 11:07:04 02/28/07 (0)
- Plus they stink up a storm! (nt) - korneluk 06:54:11 02/27/07 (5)
- "Stink up" what "storm"? - cheap-Jack 08:24:47 02/27/07 (4)
- Re: "Stink up" what "storm"? - korneluk 08:45:19 02/27/07 (3)
- Sorry, your textbook quote can't help me this time. - cheap-Jack 09:16:59 02/27/07 (2)
- Re: Sorry, your textbook quote can't help me this time. - korneluk 13:11:04 02/27/07 (1)
- Is what I said so far not clear enough? - cheap-Jack 13:40:04 02/27/07 (0)
- I am amazed - - Gingertube 18:55:15 02/26/07 (6)
- So I must be very very lucky. - cheap-Jack 08:05:28 02/27/07 (5)
- "with zero DC potential across the terminals" - Tre' 10:00:14 02/27/07 (4)
- Technically there is some DC if used as couping cap. - cheap-Jack 11:18:17 02/27/07 (3)
- Re: Technically there is some DC if used as couping cap. - Tre' 11:35:33 02/27/07 (2)
- No, he did not. - cheap-Jack 12:04:12 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: No, he did not. - Tre' 12:28:36 02/27/07 (0)
- So what happens to the precious input stage when.... - Russ57 18:29:50 02/26/07 (0)
- Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - Tom Bavis 17:15:14 02/26/07 (3)
- Give me something more audio relevant, please. - cheap-Jack 18:35:00 02/26/07 (2)
- more audio relevant, please. - NoWay 07:19:53 02/27/07 (1)
- There's always a price to pay on anything. - cheap-Jack 08:41:56 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - TimFox 16:55:46 02/26/07 (0)
- I remember... - Dave Cigna 15:47:31 02/26/07 (0)
- You better be wearing your saftey glasses...... - thermionic addictions 13:00:49 02/26/07 (17)
- Under what "right" conditions, may I learn from you? (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:03:17 02/26/07 (16)
- Re: Under what "right" conditions, may I learn from you? (nt) - Chris O 13:18:42 02/26/07 (15)
- Re: Under what "right" conditions, may I learn from you? (nt) - thermionic addictions 13:20:28 02/27/07 (0)
- So timing is the factor. - cheap-Jack 13:45:41 02/26/07 (13)
- Re: some people shouldn't have guns.... - Matts_ 13:52:01 02/26/07 (12)
- Darwin also wrote ... - danlaudionut 16:16:52 02/26/07 (11)
- Re: Darwin also wrote ... - Dave Cigna 17:02:43 02/26/07 (10)
- Observations... - Triode_Kingdom 08:03:03 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: Darwin also wrote ... - danlaudionut 18:30:32 02/26/07 (8)
- Re: Darwin also wrote ... - sheldone@cox.net 20:12:26 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: an extraordinarily organized event - danlaudionut 16:29:28 03/02/07 (0)
- What flood? - Lew 17:07:25 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: Noah & the Flood...AH forget it (nt) - danlaudionut 16:30:58 03/02/07 (0)
- a thought.. - knugen 04:32:48 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: a thought.. - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 05:25:56 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: Darwin also wrote ... - Dave Cigna 02:11:13 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: Darwin also wrote ... - Matts_ 08:01:52 02/27/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: Sorry, your textbook quote can't help me this time. - korneluk 13:11:04 02/27/07 (1)
- Is what I said so far not clear enough? - cheap-Jack 13:40:04 02/27/07 (0)