Re: So John Curl farted around in his IEEE papers, or you ? - Tre'

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - cheap-Jack 12:44:05 02/26/07 (82)

Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - bpur 00:14:37 03/01/07 (0)

Try a car battery. - Pete Millett 00:22:10 02/28/07 (8)

Thanks yr concern to an "idiot" like me. - cheap-Jack 08:11:45 02/28/07 (7)

Re: Speaking of such - Ron Oehlert 09:28:01 02/28/07 (6)

So where to post you think would be more appropriate ? - cheap-Jack 10:51:25 02/28/07 (5)

should "tube diy" readers start discussing cables/speaker/etc in this forum section because they are capable? - jarthel 21:57:15 02/28/07 (1)

No, strictly speaking, they should not. - cheap-Jack 07:41:33 03/01/07 (0)

all these irrelevant stirrup - Russ57 13:50:56 02/28/07 (2)

How "much better" today's cap performance ? - cheap-Jack 12:57:38 03/01/07 (0)

Let me clarify ... (very long) - cheap-Jack 08:42:39 03/01/07 (0)

is this suitable for high voltage applications since this was posted in "Tubes DIY"? - jarthel 21:54:46 02/27/07 (2)

Why? - cheap-Jack 10:37:49 02/28/07 (1)

Correction: "double" capacitance should read "half". (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:36:41 03/01/07 (0)

I have the John Curl 1978 IEEE Paper - email me for a copy... - korneluk 14:31:47 02/27/07 (9)

I can only fax it over. Likewise, John Curl faxed it to me. (nt) - cheap-Jack 09:05:06 02/28/07 (8)

Email me for a soft copy in PDF format if you would like. (nt) - korneluk 10:48:31 02/28/07 (7)

Why not ask John direct? - cheap-Jack 10:59:16 02/28/07 (6)

I was offering you a soft copy which I downloaded... - korneluk 11:16:00 02/28/07 (5)

Hi, I have not received your email download. (nt) - cheap-Jack 08:45:08 03/01/07 (3)

I need your email address - korneluk 09:55:35 03/01/07 (2)

I just got it. Thanks. - cheap-Jack 15:34:04 03/01/07 (0)

Just emailed you. (nt) - cheap-Jack 15:07:29 03/01/07 (0)

Just emailed over. - cheap-Jack 11:27:52 02/28/07 (0)

Not according to this video clip - fatbottle 09:04:20 02/27/07 (15)

So John Curl farted around in his IEEE papers, or you ? - cheap-Jack 09:29:28 02/27/07 (14)

Re: So John Curl farted around in his IEEE papers, or you ? - Tre' 09:57:43 02/27/07 (11)

Nope, I hold no "position" at all. - cheap-Jack 10:59:28 02/27/07 (10)

a solution - Dave Cigna 13:52:06 02/27/07 (7)

Yes, it works as John Curl already hinted. - cheap-Jack 08:57:37 02/28/07 (0)

Yes! Ignore this thread!! :-) nt - Stephen R 05:21:53 02/28/07 (0)

Re: a solution - corerosin 01:49:58 02/28/07 (3)

This is something sensible I want to read. - cheap-Jack 08:49:43 02/28/07 (2)

Re: This is something sensible I want to read. - corerosin 12:08:31 02/28/07 (1)

I agree to your sensible reply. - cheap-Jack 12:25:13 02/28/07 (0)

Dave, that's perfect in this case. (nt) - Tre' 15:51:00 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Nope, I hold no "position" at all. - Tre' 11:31:32 02/27/07 (1)

Here is my argument. - cheap-Jack 11:58:16 02/27/07 (1)

? - fatbottle 09:56:03 02/27/07 (1)

Talk sense, farter ! - cheap-Jack 10:37:40 02/27/07 (1)

Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - Lew 07:09:18 02/27/07 (0)

Jack - you are a whoose! - Allen Wright 04:57:15 02/27/07 (9)

Very amusing, far better than my "whoose" talk. - cheap-Jack 08:14:05 02/27/07 (2)

I do it accidentially often enough to not need to do it on purpose! (nt) - Allen Wright 05:39:27 02/28/07 (1)

Allen, glad you still want to talk to an "idiot" like me. (nt) - cheap-Jack 11:07:04 02/28/07 (0)

Plus they stink up a storm! (nt) - korneluk 06:54:11 02/27/07 (5)

"Stink up" what "storm"? - cheap-Jack 08:24:47 02/27/07 (4)

Re: "Stink up" what "storm"? - korneluk 08:45:19 02/27/07 (3)

Sorry, your textbook quote can't help me this time. - cheap-Jack 09:16:59 02/27/07 (2)

Re: Sorry, your textbook quote can't help me this time. - korneluk 13:11:04 02/27/07 (1)

Is what I said so far not clear enough? - cheap-Jack 13:40:04 02/27/07 (0)

I am amazed - - Gingertube 18:55:15 02/26/07 (6)

So I must be very very lucky. - cheap-Jack 08:05:28 02/27/07 (5)

"with zero DC potential across the terminals" - Tre' 10:00:14 02/27/07 (4)

Technically there is some DC if used as couping cap. - cheap-Jack 11:18:17 02/27/07 (3)

Re: Technically there is some DC if used as couping cap. - Tre' 11:35:33 02/27/07 (2)

No, he did not. - cheap-Jack 12:04:12 02/27/07 (1)

Re: No, he did not. - Tre' 12:28:36 02/27/07 (0)

So what happens to the precious input stage when.... - Russ57 18:29:50 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - Tom Bavis 17:15:14 02/26/07 (3)

Give me something more audio relevant, please. - cheap-Jack 18:35:00 02/26/07 (2)

more audio relevant, please. - NoWay 07:19:53 02/27/07 (1)

There's always a price to pay on anything. - cheap-Jack 08:41:56 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, no bangs on reversing 'lytic cap to DC. (long) - TimFox 16:55:46 02/26/07 (0)

I remember... - Dave Cigna 15:47:31 02/26/07 (0)

You better be wearing your saftey glasses...... - thermionic addictions 13:00:49 02/26/07 (17)

Under what "right" conditions, may I learn from you? (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:03:17 02/26/07 (16)

Re: Under what "right" conditions, may I learn from you? (nt) - Chris O 13:18:42 02/26/07 (15)

Re: Under what "right" conditions, may I learn from you? (nt) - thermionic addictions 13:20:28 02/27/07 (0)

So timing is the factor. - cheap-Jack 13:45:41 02/26/07 (13)

Re: some people shouldn't have guns.... - Matts_ 13:52:01 02/26/07 (12)

Darwin also wrote ... - danlaudionut 16:16:52 02/26/07 (11)

Re: Darwin also wrote ... - Dave Cigna 17:02:43 02/26/07 (10)

Observations... - Triode_Kingdom 08:03:03 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Darwin also wrote ... - danlaudionut 18:30:32 02/26/07 (8)

Re: Darwin also wrote ... - sheldone@cox.net 20:12:26 02/27/07 (1)

Re: an extraordinarily organized event - danlaudionut 16:29:28 03/02/07 (0)

What flood? - Lew 17:07:25 02/27/07 (1)

Re: Noah & the Flood...AH forget it (nt) - danlaudionut 16:30:58 03/02/07 (0)

a thought.. - knugen 04:32:48 02/27/07 (1)

Re: a thought.. - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 05:25:56 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Darwin also wrote ... - Dave Cigna 02:11:13 02/27/07 (1)

Re: Darwin also wrote ... - Matts_ 08:01:52 02/27/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: So John Curl farted around in his IEEE papers, or you ? - Tre' 09:57:43 02/27/07 (11)

Nope, I hold no "position" at all. - cheap-Jack 10:59:28 02/27/07 (10)

a solution - Dave Cigna 13:52:06 02/27/07 (7)

Yes, it works as John Curl already hinted. - cheap-Jack 08:57:37 02/28/07 (0)

Yes! Ignore this thread!! :-) nt - Stephen R 05:21:53 02/28/07 (0)

Re: a solution - corerosin 01:49:58 02/28/07 (3)

This is something sensible I want to read. - cheap-Jack 08:49:43 02/28/07 (2)

Re: This is something sensible I want to read. - corerosin 12:08:31 02/28/07 (1)

I agree to your sensible reply. - cheap-Jack 12:25:13 02/28/07 (0)

Dave, that's perfect in this case. (nt) - Tre' 15:51:00 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Nope, I hold no "position" at all. - Tre' 11:31:32 02/27/07 (1)

Here is my argument. - cheap-Jack 11:58:16 02/27/07 (1)