In Reply to: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. posted by 3+4=5 on June 30, 2017 at 10:01:44:
Polite, you said? I may sound indignant but I am always polite. I described a similar situation with a seller from England. The fact is that both the CDP received from England and my cassette recorder did not work. But the sellers' approach is quite different.
In my case, the seller was just unwilling to cooperate, and not because I was "impolite"...A negative feedback, even a single one (but actually, the second one) would spoil his reputation and he won't be able to sell anything at all worth of thousands of $$$ if I proceed with it...But I am still waiting...Isn't it wise to consider all pros and cons of paying a repair compensation against receiving a negative feedback? It's odd...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - akolegov 11:37:20 06/30/17 (7)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - richard_s34022 13:08:07 06/30/17 (6)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - akolegov 13:35:13 06/30/17 (5)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - richard_s34022 03:44:08 07/01/17 (4)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - akolegov 04:08:14 07/01/17 (3)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - bcowen 06:20:33 07/01/17 (2)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - akolegov 12:08:13 07/01/17 (0)
- RE: It is not fraud. Period. So the recorder broke with in transit. - akolegov 09:53:15 07/01/17 (0)