In Reply to: RE: should read 22$ for the schematic,and not 224 posted by kgturner on February 9, 2010 at 19:28:54:
I hear you.The grudge was a matter of principle.When I saw him advertising himself on the net after a few years of silence,I thought that I had an opportunity to set a wrong right.It wasn't the 22$,but that I really needed a schematic as ,in the country where I live-there are only 2 such amplifiers,and if something should go wrong...
I ordered again because I had no choice,I had been looking for years for a 220V transformer(power) instead of the stock 110V.I thought what the hell,after what he had been through with me,he wouldn't risk a repeat performance.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: should read 22$ for the schematic,and not 224 - r17 01:28:41 03/01/10 (2)
- RE: should read 22$ for the schematic,and not 224 - Cleantimestream 22:29:03 03/02/10 (1)
- RE: should read 22$ for the schematic,and not 224 - becketma@yahoo.com 20:11:57 03/10/10 (0)