In Reply to: I cringe at the thought of defending George but ... posted by Garth on December 31, 2006 at 06:21:57:
Hi Garth,If George is saying that the datastream itself is inverted, does that turn lands into pits and pits into lands? I don't believe that acoustic polarity can necessarily be changed simply by inverting the digital signal - but it may be possible to make dramatic changes by doing that very thing.
For instance: could a digital word with a value of, say, 0110110100001110 theoretically be changed to a value of 1001001011110001 by a polarity inversion of the data read from the laser or the machester code of the S/PDIF stream? And are these values simply acoustically polar-opposites of the same amplitude value on the same waveform?
I don't think it works that way.
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Could be wrong ... - Sommovigo 09:33:41 12/31/06 (2)
- Re: Could be wrong ... Probably! :-) - Garth 12:12:17 12/31/06 (0)
- Re: Could be wrong ... - unclestu52 18:09:45 12/31/06 (0)