In Reply to: RE: That's interesting posted by tube wrangler on August 8, 2017 at 14:22:24:
Dennis, I tried to explain this to you once before.
There is only one waveform (per channel).
All the sounds (in that channel) are mixed together into one waveform.
At any given moment that waveform has only one amplitude therefore I am measuring all of them.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 15:19:43 08/08/17 (26)
- RE: That's interesting - tube wrangler 16:19:52 08/08/17 (22)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 17:01:34 08/08/17 (20)
- Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Frihed89 00:13:31 08/09/17 (19)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - tube wrangler 22:17:02 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 08:34:36 08/09/17 (16)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - used-hifi 15:06:04 08/09/17 (15)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - tube wrangler 13:01:46 08/10/17 (6)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 20:08:31 08/10/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Tre' 14:48:28 08/10/17 (4)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Cleantimestream 01:55:10 08/12/17 (3)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - drummerwill 09:40:01 08/12/17 (2)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - GEO 09:10:58 08/13/17 (1)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - PakProtector 16:50:43 09/08/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 19:26:58 08/09/17 (6)
- you impugn the term, 'science' - PakProtector 14:07:02 08/10/17 (5)
- RE: you impugn the term, 'science' - GEO 05:02:47 08/11/17 (1)
- soooodo-ssyence... - PakProtector 16:26:23 08/12/17 (0)
- RE: you impugn the term, 'science' - Tre' 15:00:33 08/10/17 (2)
- No.2 describes 'IT' pretty well... - PakProtector 15:05:08 08/10/17 (1)
- That's a good question. (nt) - Tre' 07:45:30 08/11/17 (0)
- re: Prove them wrong!! - Tre' 15:59:40 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Tre' 08:17:53 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: That's interesting - PakProtector 16:43:48 08/08/17 (0)
- not *THAT'S* interesting... - PakProtector 15:45:07 08/08/17 (2)
- RE: not *THAT'S* interesting... - tube wrangler 16:29:22 08/08/17 (1)
- RE: not *THAT'S* interesting... - PakProtector 16:38:26 08/08/17 (0)