In Reply to: I am not trying to bash anyone on this subject posted by Frihed89 on August 7, 2017 at 04:18:35:
"the argument is made by some people that ears+brains can detect sonic differences that some tests can not. "
But in many (most?) cases, such witnesses have reached their conclusions with no measurements even to determine frequency response or distortion. These types of empirical judgements are entirely invalid.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I am not trying to bash anyone on this subject - Triode_Kingdom 08:13:04 08/07/17 (41)
- ...To my ears..... - drummerwill 09:16:28 08/07/17 (40)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - Tre' 09:30:36 08/07/17 (39)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - tube wrangler 10:08:45 08/08/17 (38)
- RE: ...To my ears..... Sorry Dennis.... - drummerwill 18:27:46 08/08/17 (3)
- RE: ...To my ears..... Sorry Dennis.... - tube wrangler 21:58:28 08/09/17 (2)
- Um, Dennis... if the recording studio is not implementing Your approach... we are STILL missing information,No - Cleantimestream 01:55:21 08/10/17 (1)
- RE: Um, Dennis... if the recording studio is not implementing Your approach... we are STILL missing information,No - tube wrangler 10:01:54 08/10/17 (0)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - Tre' 10:43:46 08/08/17 (33)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - tube wrangler 10:56:44 08/08/17 (32)
- RE: evidence = RMAF or GPA ... - deathtube 667 08:52:18 08/14/17 (0)
- That's interesting - Frihed89 12:54:51 08/08/17 (29)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 14:12:04 08/08/17 (28)
- RE: That's interesting - tube wrangler 14:22:24 08/08/17 (27)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 15:19:43 08/08/17 (26)
- RE: That's interesting - tube wrangler 16:19:52 08/08/17 (22)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 17:01:34 08/08/17 (20)
- Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Frihed89 00:13:31 08/09/17 (19)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - tube wrangler 22:17:02 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 08:34:36 08/09/17 (16)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - used-hifi 15:06:04 08/09/17 (15)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - tube wrangler 13:01:46 08/10/17 (6)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 20:08:31 08/10/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Tre' 14:48:28 08/10/17 (4)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Cleantimestream 01:55:10 08/12/17 (3)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - drummerwill 09:40:01 08/12/17 (2)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - GEO 09:10:58 08/13/17 (1)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - PakProtector 16:50:43 09/08/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 19:26:58 08/09/17 (6)
- you impugn the term, 'science' - PakProtector 14:07:02 08/10/17 (5)
- RE: you impugn the term, 'science' - GEO 05:02:47 08/11/17 (1)
- soooodo-ssyence... - PakProtector 16:26:23 08/12/17 (0)
- RE: you impugn the term, 'science' - Tre' 15:00:33 08/10/17 (2)
- No.2 describes 'IT' pretty well... - PakProtector 15:05:08 08/10/17 (1)
- That's a good question. (nt) - Tre' 07:45:30 08/11/17 (0)
- re: Prove them wrong!! - Tre' 15:59:40 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Tre' 08:17:53 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: That's interesting - PakProtector 16:43:48 08/08/17 (0)
- not *THAT'S* interesting... - PakProtector 15:45:07 08/08/17 (2)
- RE: not *THAT'S* interesting... - tube wrangler 16:29:22 08/08/17 (1)
- RE: not *THAT'S* interesting... - PakProtector 16:38:26 08/08/17 (0)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - Tre' 11:33:15 08/08/17 (0)