In Reply to: The above is only opinion. There is not one bit of objective evidence given. (nt) posted by Tre' on August 6, 2017 at 14:26:10:
Tube Wrangler is, I think (if I am not being too presumptuous) talking about tuning by ear - his ears and those of others who have heard his amps. (even without comparisons of different bypassing approaches).
What objective tests would you perform and what criteria would you use to determine which, among various bypass methods, is "best"? I don't know the answer to the question. I do know that in some cases, the argument is made by some people that ears+brains can detect sonic differences that some tests can not.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I am not trying to bash anyone on this subject - Frihed89 04:18:35 08/07/17 (44)
- RE: I am not trying to bash anyone on this subject - Tre' 08:13:50 08/07/17 (1)
- RE: I am not trying to bash anyone on this subject - tube wrangler 09:58:02 08/08/17 (0)
- RE: I am not trying to bash anyone on this subject - Triode_Kingdom 08:13:04 08/07/17 (41)
- ...To my ears..... - drummerwill 09:16:28 08/07/17 (40)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - Tre' 09:30:36 08/07/17 (39)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - tube wrangler 10:08:45 08/08/17 (38)
- RE: ...To my ears..... Sorry Dennis.... - drummerwill 18:27:46 08/08/17 (3)
- RE: ...To my ears..... Sorry Dennis.... - tube wrangler 21:58:28 08/09/17 (2)
- Um, Dennis... if the recording studio is not implementing Your approach... we are STILL missing information,No - Cleantimestream 01:55:21 08/10/17 (1)
- RE: Um, Dennis... if the recording studio is not implementing Your approach... we are STILL missing information,No - tube wrangler 10:01:54 08/10/17 (0)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - Tre' 10:43:46 08/08/17 (33)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - tube wrangler 10:56:44 08/08/17 (32)
- RE: evidence = RMAF or GPA ... - deathtube 667 08:52:18 08/14/17 (0)
- That's interesting - Frihed89 12:54:51 08/08/17 (29)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 14:12:04 08/08/17 (28)
- RE: That's interesting - tube wrangler 14:22:24 08/08/17 (27)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 15:19:43 08/08/17 (26)
- RE: That's interesting - tube wrangler 16:19:52 08/08/17 (22)
- RE: That's interesting - Tre' 17:01:34 08/08/17 (20)
- Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Frihed89 00:13:31 08/09/17 (19)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - tube wrangler 22:17:02 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 08:34:36 08/09/17 (16)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - used-hifi 15:06:04 08/09/17 (15)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - tube wrangler 13:01:46 08/10/17 (6)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 20:08:31 08/10/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Tre' 14:48:28 08/10/17 (4)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Cleantimestream 01:55:10 08/12/17 (3)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - drummerwill 09:40:01 08/12/17 (2)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - GEO 09:10:58 08/13/17 (1)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering ...I've heard his system ... - PakProtector 16:50:43 09/08/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - GEO 19:26:58 08/09/17 (6)
- you impugn the term, 'science' - PakProtector 14:07:02 08/10/17 (5)
- RE: you impugn the term, 'science' - GEO 05:02:47 08/11/17 (1)
- soooodo-ssyence... - PakProtector 16:26:23 08/12/17 (0)
- RE: you impugn the term, 'science' - Tre' 15:00:33 08/10/17 (2)
- No.2 describes 'IT' pretty well... - PakProtector 15:05:08 08/10/17 (1)
- That's a good question. (nt) - Tre' 07:45:30 08/11/17 (0)
- re: Prove them wrong!! - Tre' 15:59:40 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: Yes, that is interesting, but I am still wondering - Tre' 08:17:53 08/09/17 (0)
- RE: That's interesting - PakProtector 16:43:48 08/08/17 (0)
- not *THAT'S* interesting... - PakProtector 15:45:07 08/08/17 (2)
- RE: not *THAT'S* interesting... - tube wrangler 16:29:22 08/08/17 (1)
- RE: not *THAT'S* interesting... - PakProtector 16:38:26 08/08/17 (0)
- RE: ...To my ears..... - Tre' 11:33:15 08/08/17 (0)