In Reply to: designing with that attitude leads to confirmation bias posted by Kloss on October 13, 2016 at 06:02:02:
The folks who claim to have the answers usually have none.
When you see a bunch of pseudo-technical terms applied to justify their results...followed by an attack on those who exercise an Engineering analysis ought to be enough reason to ignore.
That this sort of behavior is well documented, it looks more like some sort of willful ignorance or just outright nastiness to keep pushing it.
I just love laughing at the claims. So utterly ridiculous...like a 2A3 amp with just the right wiring and a driver stage designed to start rolling off in the early 5 digit CPS domain able to deliver power 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than its actual capability. OMG...and the response when asked is to suggest traveling some hundreds of miles to hear one for myself????
Are you out ov yer Vulcan mind, Spock?
cheers,
Douglas
Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- another take in the same direction.... - PakProtector 03:52:08 12/20/16 (0)