In Reply to: RE: "Everything on the bias circuit is audible" posted by aknaydenov on April 7, 2016 at 23:47:45:
"There is a certain level where the builder becomes aware that most electronic measurements and theory don't correlate with the resulting sound quality. So he starts looking elsewhere.From my experience, people who don't look further always build limited devices that are trapped by their own boundaries."
I don't see precise enough statements here to be able to evaluate them properly. In the case under discussion, of fixed bias supplies, I was assuming that by "fixed bias" you meant a supply that was of constant voltage.
It is easy enough to arrange such a supply to be essentially of any arbitrarily desired degree of constancy. If you are saying that you have found that by playing with the various components in such an "ideal" supply you can obtain sounds that you find more pleasing to the ear, then that is certainly logically possible. It might be, for example, that a bit of mains ripple superimposed on the bias supply might be more appealing to some listeners. Or a frequency-dependent colouration caused by insufficient smoothing capacitance for achieving constant voltage across the spectrum.
But any such deviations from a truly fixed voltage bias supply would easily be measurable by using suitable test equipment. Whether "most electronic measurements" would be able to pick up the effects would be dependent on how you define or quantify "most." I could easily believe that many measurements performed around the world might be of insufficient accuracy to pick up the effects at the necessary level of precision. But that is quite different from the implication that is tacitly, I think, suggested by your statement, namely that no possible measurements could be made that would be able to correlate the sounds with the measurements.
Chris
Edits: 04/08/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Everything on the bias circuit is audible" - cpotl 17:22:01 04/08/16 (16)
- RE: "Everything on the bias circuit is audible" - aknaydenov 05:31:57 04/09/16 (15)
- RE: "Everything on the bias circuit is audible" - Tre' 13:03:45 04/09/16 (13)
- Timbre - Tre' 14:10:48 04/09/16 (11)
- Attacks come first in importance, and then decays, and harmonics on the continuus tone come last - Timbo in Oz 17:15:17 04/12/16 (10)
- RE: Attacks come first in importance, and then decays, and harmonics on the continuus tone come last - Tre' 18:19:47 04/13/16 (2)
- The bit below the quoted article noted that this was opinion. - Timbo in Oz 22:25:17 04/13/16 (1)
- RE: The bit below the quoted article noted that this was opinion. - Tre' 11:35:31 04/14/16 (0)
- No Valve Rectifiers? - Triode_Kingdom 13:09:29 04/13/16 (6)
- two of those resistors that coe n slowly one on the primary AC feed and one on the HT secondary. - Timbo in Oz 14:41:48 04/13/16 (5)
- I don't think that's very effective - Triode_Kingdom 08:21:40 04/14/16 (0)
- What, pray tell, is 'coe n'? (NT) - jeffreybehr 18:42:18 04/13/16 (3)
- come on? Sorry - Timbo in Oz 21:27:28 04/13/16 (2)
- RE: come on? Sorry - aknaydenov 10:38:17 04/14/16 (1)
- RE: come on? Sorry - drlowmu 21:02:47 05/01/16 (0)
- As Richard C. Heyser conjectured... we know not ... yet... what to measure.~nT - Cleantimestream 13:29:44 04/09/16 (0)
- +1 - drlowmu 10:46:01 04/09/16 (0)