In Reply to: RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) posted by morricab on August 23, 2015 at 01:22:42:
"So, to you if there is no formal information on something then it doesn't exist? Maybe the transformer is the victim of pre-conceived notions and not many people decided to find out if there was a break-in effect?"
I think there is sometimes a tendency to fantasise that things are more profound and complicated than they really are. It is maybe nice to dream that one's home stereo amplifier is going to reveal deep truths about fundamental electrical principles that have been overlooked by all the EE experts for decades. But maybe a home stereo amplifier really is just the rather simple piece of electronics that others say it is. It doesn't have to deal with the demanding circumstances of high frequencies or high currents that EEs have learned how to cope with in much more challenging areas in electronics. Perhaps it really is just a rather trivial application, after all.
If those who speak of all these subtleties in audio reproduction were able to demonstrate in proper double-blind testing that they could actually hear the effects they claim to hear, then it might be more convincing. But evidence from such tests seems to show that people, even "pros," are hard pressed to distinguish between *any* pair of amplifiers that have reasonably low THD if their frequency responses have been matched if necessary by means of simple RC networks.
Chris
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 10:47:33 08/23/15 (26)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 03:54:27 08/24/15 (25)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - gusser 09:58:56 08/24/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 05:02:53 08/24/15 (23)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 08:40:49 08/24/15 (22)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 09:19:35 08/24/15 (20)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 09:49:33 08/24/15 (19)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 21:11:08 08/24/15 (18)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 02:44:01 08/25/15 (12)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - gusser 12:08:01 08/25/15 (3)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 15:33:54 08/25/15 (2)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - gusser 20:43:22 08/25/15 (1)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 01:17:23 08/26/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 06:52:07 08/25/15 (7)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 15:38:59 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 09:14:18 08/25/15 (5)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 15:47:59 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 09:16:15 08/25/15 (3)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 11:25:29 08/25/15 (2)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 18:03:36 08/25/15 (1)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Mr_Steady 19:04:24 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 22:38:47 08/24/15 (4)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 23:35:48 08/24/15 (3)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - morricab 02:46:03 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 00:03:18 08/25/15 (1)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - cpotl 01:11:21 08/25/15 (0)
- RE: Nobody here ever said tubes don't need break in. (nt) - Garg0yle 09:06:26 08/24/15 (0)