SET Asylum

Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram...

72.208.143.169

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author

...is right here and at the link. It is NOT copyrighted and is NOT a product of Coincident Speaker Technology or Israel Blume.
Several caps are marked 'F' instead of 'uF', and C10 (upper-left) is 2.2uF and not 220 uF. (Mr. Blume told me that cap was a cathode bypass.)
----------
Tin-eared audiofool, large-scale-Classical music lover, and damned-amateur fotografer.
William Bruce Cameron: "...not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
http://s89.photobucket.com/user/jeffreybehr/media/Coincident (Open in New Window)

Edits: 03/20/14 03/21/14

Follow Ups:

Origin of the Frankenstein Amp - Rick R 18:43:22 03/22/14 (3)
- Indeed a good story, and TY. Arthur Salvatore relayed... - jeffreybehr 22:20:06 03/22/14 (0)
- Great story - Metralla 21:47:56 03/22/14 (0)
- RE: Origin of the Frankenstein Amp - drlowmu 19:19:00 03/22/14 (0)
How do they sound? - Jon L 13:11:09 03/22/14 (1)
- Some comments in the linked thread. - jeffreybehr 19:04:48 03/22/14 (0)
RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - dave slagle 18:52:24 03/21/14 (1)
- Shouting? Two NOTs to emphasize what the schematic isn't is shouting? - jeffreybehr 20:31:43 03/21/14 (0)
Errors in schematic - Salectric 18:50:51 03/21/14 (4)
- Have you seen the amp? Have you traced and prepared a schematic diagram? - jeffreybehr 20:42:38 03/21/14 (3)
  - RE: Have you seen the amp? Have you traced and prepared a schematic diagram? - Salectric 03:09:39 03/22/14 (2)
    - RE: Have you seen the amp? Have you traced and prepared a schematic diagram? - sonicboom 11:39:28 03/22/14 (0)
    - Very interesting - Metralla 07:23:16 03/22/14 (0)
RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - Caucasian Blackplate 14:58:05 03/21/14 (3)
- I have no opinion about that, as in I don't even understand your question. - jeffreybehr 17:57:58 03/21/14 (2)
  - RE: I have no opinion about that, as in I don't even understand your question. - Salectric 18:43:53 03/21/14 (1)
    - RE: I have no opinion about that, as in I don't even understand your question. - Caucasian Blackplate 09:41:38 03/22/14 (0)
RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - Michael Samra 02:42:47 03/21/14 (9)
- Yes, Michael, the 2.2uF decoupler is C10 and not C16. Also, I've measured Voltages... - jeffreybehr 12:19:42 03/21/14 (8)
  - Supply's Design ....... - drlowmu 19:12:44 03/22/14 (0)
  - RE: Yes, Michael, the 2.2uF decoupler is C10 and not C16. Also, I've measured Voltages... - Michael Samra 17:03:04 03/21/14 (2)
    - The 2.2uF decoupler is a film cap (another cheap, edgy-sounding Solen fastcap)... - jeffreybehr 17:43:26 03/21/14 (1)
      - RE: The 2.2uF decoupler is a film cap (another cheap, edgy-sounding Solen fastcap)... - Michael Samra 06:59:33 03/22/14 (0)
  - RE: Yes, Michael, the 2.2uF decoupler is C10 and not C16. Also, I've measured Voltages... - danlaudionut 13:40:04 03/21/14 (3)
    - RE: Yes, Michael, the 2.2uF decoupler is C10 and not C16. Also, I've measured Voltages... - jeffreybehr 17:05:33 03/21/14 (2)
      - RE: Yes, Michael, the 2.2uF decoupler is C10 and not C16. Also, I've measured Voltages... - danlaudionut 17:28:09 03/21/14 (1)
        
        TYVM. (NT) - jeffreybehr 17:51:05 03/21/14 (0)
RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - danlaudionut 00:27:25 03/21/14 (7)
- RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - Salectric 03:50:25 03/21/14 (6)
  - RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - danlaudionut 03:57:19 03/21/14 (5)
    - RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - charles1dad 15:58:55 03/22/14 (4)
      - RE: Coincident Frankenstein II schematic diagram... - danlaudionut 16:55:18 03/22/14 (3)
        
        "Actually all three will benefit the bottom 1/2 octave." +1 (nt) - Tre' 17:01:33 03/22/14 (2)
        
        RE: "Actually all three will benefit the bottom 1/2 octave." +1 (nt) - charles1dad 18:53:07 03/22/14 (1)
        
        RE: "Actually all three will benefit the bottom 1/2 octave." +1 (nt) - charles1dad 19:36:16 03/22/14 (0)