75.82.52.72
'); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: Dennis Fraker posted by tube wrangler on May 23, 2012 at 01:14:57
First you talked about getting more actual, physical work out of less watts and now you are talking about the watts being different.You could have said a "clean" watt will "sound" (be perceived as) more powerful than a "dirty" watt.
But your original statement went well beyond that.
"does a watt that cannot relate to changing musical conditions have the same physical forces as a watt that can?"
Yes. It will displace the voice coil by the same amount as any other watt.
If it's inability to relate to the changing musical conditions are preventing it from following the waveform to it's peaks then it's not a watt.
It would be something less than one full watt unless the input was increased to compensate. But now we are talking about distortion when I thought we we talking a bout watts?
The problem (in this conversation) is your mis-understand of what a watt is.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Edits: 05/23/12Follow Ups: