In Reply to: RE: WECo 91A/B--Long, but hopefully informative posted by maxhifi on November 22, 2014 at 12:46:51:
I thought the 6SJ7 was an octal tube?
Or are you speaking of the WE 310?
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - Ivan303 18:29:22 11/22/14 (13)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - maxhifi 19:09:04 11/22/14 (12)
- "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - Jim Dowdy 06:17:58 11/23/14 (7)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - Mr_Steady 10:46:30 11/23/14 (6)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - maxhifi 12:07:33 11/23/14 (5)
- 'it is not the same tube internally' - Jim Dowdy 14:01:56 11/23/14 (3)
- RE: 'it is not the same tube internally' - maxhifi 14:45:12 11/23/14 (2)
- RE: 'it is not the same tube internally' - Jim Dowdy 16:54:37 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: 'it is not the same tube internally' - Tre' 19:16:57 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7" - Mr_Steady 12:21:19 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - Mr_Steady 05:25:57 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - maxhifi 10:02:35 11/23/14 (0)
- RE: "6J7 has lower distortion than 6SJ7, and it avoids the need for a weird tube socket. " - RC Daniel 20:58:40 11/22/14 (0)
- Yes, I assumed as much... - Ivan303 19:36:15 11/22/14 (0)