In Reply to: RE: OPT for 2A3/300B design posted by Paul Joppa on July 12, 2011 at 11:03:39:
You simply haven't a peer to read, understand, and be willing to participate in corroborating your story. Therefore, I suggest warning that your posting is technical so most will not have it fly over their heads and they can skip your post. :-)
As for me, I have not seen the physics you wrote about on that claim myself, so I am not yet there with you. But it sounded good. If you also had an independent internet link supporting your message, I would like to read it. Thanks, Paul.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What we have here is a communication problem - kurt s 07:57:31 07/16/11 (7)
- RE: What we have here is a communication problem - Paul Joppa 14:09:51 07/16/11 (6)
- Thanks, Paul. That graph is worth more than a thousand words. - kurt s 19:40:03 07/16/11 (5)
- RE: Thanks, Paul. That graph is worth more than a thousand words. - Paul Joppa 21:49:39 07/16/11 (4)
- RE: Thanks, Paul. That graph is worth more than a thousand words. - kurt s 23:25:50 07/16/11 (3)
- RE: Thanks, Paul. That graph is worth more than a thousand words. - viren 21:41:54 07/17/11 (2)
- RE: Thanks, Paul. That graph is worth more than a thousand words. - Paul Joppa 17:15:55 07/18/11 (1)
- "of course I continue to learn more and have to adjust the notes to correspond! " - kurt s 22:30:31 07/18/11 (0)