In Reply to: RE: SET active versus passive biamplification posted by danlaudionut on July 6, 2011 at 04:35:15:
Not if mid bass is 24ohm and 106db 1 watt then inductor is the best way. This all comes down to end design some loudspeakers and systems would do best active some passive. I use simple passive on my designs unless for subbass use then active steep slope. I also gave up biamping from 70hz-25khz on my horn systems if design is proper biamping in this range negatively effects sound quality. But below 70hz or so it doesn't matter to end result and is preferable to running tubes on low bass. So I biamp with active SS on bass horn and run rest simple passive best of both worlds plus I need no level matching.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: SET active versus passive biamplification - Steyr 06:07:39 07/06/11 (3)
- RE: SET active versus passive biamplification - danlaudionut 09:55:14 07/06/11 (2)
- RE: SET active versus passive biamplification - Steyr 10:52:15 07/06/11 (1)
- Real Purty 8^D (nt) - danlaudionut 11:03:10 07/06/11 (0)